Skip to main content
. 2009 Dec;331(3):965–974. doi: 10.1124/jpet.109.158014

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Determination of drug efficacy (Emax) in binding assays. A, in most binding assays of this study, the concentration of [3H]FW (fluorowillardiine) was kept constant and the concentration of CX546 was varied between 0 and 6 mM. The binding data were then normalized to binding without drug and fitted with a sigmoidal function (bottom asymptote = 100, nHill = 1) to determine the EC50 for the drug (apparent drug affinity) and the maximal efficacy called Emax. The latter is calculated as the percentage increase over baseline binding in the absence of drug. B, typical saturation assay for [3H]FW in the presence and absence of 6 mM CX546 (GluA2). The data points were fitted with a hyperbolic equation. As illustrated by this example, CX546 increased the apparent affinity for the agonist but maximal binding remains unchanged (Bmax = asymptote). It is also apparent that the ratio “binding in the presence of drug” versus “binding without drug” becomes smaller as the agonist concentration increases.