Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Nucl Med. 2009 Feb 17;50(3):356–363. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.058776

Table 1.

Clinical data, histology diagnosis and 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) as well as α~[11C]methyl-L-tryptophan (AMT) PET standard uptake values measured in each lesion of the 10 patients

No. Sex/Age (yrs) Diagnosis Previous therapy (before AMT) Time between FDG/AMT PET Lesion number SUV FDG SUV AMT
#1 F/54 Thymic cyst none FDG PET not done 1 - 0.5
#2 M/39 Hamartoma none 54days (FDG later) 1 0.9 0.7
#3 M/66 Metastasis (rectal cancer) none 11days 1 2.8 1.3
#4 M/58 NSCLC [scc] Chemoth. (2weeks)* 1 month 1 15.7 2.5
#5 F/58 NSCLC [pd] Radio+Chemotherapy (> 6 months)** 1 month 1 8.0 5.5
2 6.8 4.4
#6 F/56 NSCLC [lcc] Radio+Chemoth (> 6months)** 7 days 1 5.5 2.4
2 2.8 2.7
3 3.0 2.6
4 2.7 1.6
5 2.7 2.7
#7 M/79 NSCLC [acc] none 6 days 1 2.8 1.2
#8 M/49 NSCLC [scc] none 11 days 1 7.3 2.1
2 3.3 1.7
#9 F/47 NSCLC [acc] none FDG PET not done 1 - 3.2
2 - 3.0
#10 M/46 NSCLC [pd] none 28 days 1 4.7 1.9
2 1.6 0.8

NSCLC = non-small cell lung cancer; tumors are consecutively numbered in patients with multiple lesions

scc: squamous cell carcinoma; lcc: large cell carcinoma; acc: adenocarcinoma; pd: poorly differentiated carcinoma

*

therapy started after FDG PET but 2 weeks before AMT PET scan

**

therapy was finished more than 6 months before AMT PET scan