Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Nov 15.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Cardiol. 2009 Sep 26;104(10):1343–1350. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.07.003

Table 6.

Overall quality assessment scores for observer 1 vs. observer 2 (1=poor, 2=fair, 3=good, 4=excellent, 5=near perfect)

Observer 1 Observer 2
1 2 3 4 5 Total
1 5 4 7 1 0 17
2 4 10 10 2 0 26
3 0 8 26 18 0 52
4 0 1 20 113 18 152
5 0 0 7 72 73 152
Total 9 23 70 206 91 399