Skip to main content
. 2009 Dec 8;4(12):e8209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008209

Table 1. Ability of the different molecular methods tested in this study to correctly identify HCV subtypes 1a and 1b in a series of 500 patients infected by one or the other of these subtypes.

Assay Trugene HCV 5′NC Genotyping Assay INNO-LiPA HCV 1.0 INNO-LiPA HCV 2.0 Abbott RealTime HCV Genotype II assay
Manufacturer Siemens Medical Solutions Diagnostic Innogenetics Innogenetics Abbott Molecular
Method Sequence analysis of the 5′NCR followed by sequence comparison Reverse hybridization targeting the 5′NCR Reverse hybridization targeting the 5′NCR and the core-coding region Real-time PCR assay targeting the 5′NCR and NS5B-coding region
All samples Subtype 1a * (N = 237), n/N (%) 183/237 (77.2%) 167/237 (70.5%) 231/237 (97.5%) 220/236** (93.2%)
Subtype 1b * (N = 263), n/N (%) 238/263 (90.5%) 240/263 (91.3%) 253/263 (96.2%) 232/261** (88.9%)
Samples that could be PCR-amplified only Subtype 1a * , n/N (%) 183/235(77.9%) 167/236 (70.8%) 231/232 (99.6%) 220/236 (93.2%)
Subtype 1b * , n/N (%) 238/258 (92.2%) 240/260 (92.3%) 253/255 (99.2%) 232/259 (89.6%)

Correct identification with the different techniques tested is shown for all samples, and for samples that could be amplified by PCR in the assay.

*

The correct HCV genotype 1 subtype was identified by means of direct sequence analysis of a portion of the NS5B gene followed by phylogenetic analysis, the reference method.

**

In one 1a case and two 1b cases, not enough serum volume was available for testing in the Abbott RealTime HCV Genotype II assay.