Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Dec 2.
Published in final edited form as: Synapse. 2008 Sep;62(9):700–709. doi: 10.1002/syn.20544

TABLE IV.

Relationship of binding potential to receptor affinity and nondisplaceable uptake PET radioligands for the D2/3 receptors

Radioligand
(reference)
Agonist or
antagonist
Ki (nM)a Ki: Ratio to
MNPA
VT cerebellum
(mL cm-3)
VT cerebellum
Ratio to MNPA
VS
(mL cm-3)
VS: Ratio
to MNPA
BPND
(mL cm-3)
BPND: ratio
to MNPA
[11C]MPNA Agonist 0.17 (a) 1.0 13.97 (b) 1.0 11.18 (b) 1.0 1.03 (b) 1.0
[11C]NPA Agonist 0.80 (a) 4.7 3.44 (d) 0.2 4.04 (d) 0.4 1.22 (c) 1.2
[11C]PHNO Agonist 0.14 (e) 0.8 5.81 (f) 0.4 14.63 (f) 1.3 2.7b(f) 2.6
[11C]raclopride Antagonist 1.70 (g) 10.0 0.42 (i) 0.03 0.70 (i) 0.1 3.20 (h) 3.1
[18F]fallypride Antagonist 0.03 (j) 0.2 0.95 (k) 0.1 29.29 (k) 2.6 23.30 (k) 22.6
a

Ki values are from rat and mouse. Affinity is the inverse of Ki.

b

Avg BPND value for caudate, putamen, and ventral striatum.

Note: The in vivo values of BPND, VT and VS come from the following species: [11C]MNPA and [11C]NPA from monkey; [11C]PHNO, [11C]raclopride, and [18F]fallypride are from human. a) Gao et al., 1990; b) current paper; c) Narendran et al., 2004; d) Hwang et al., 2004; e) Wilson et al.,2005; f) Ginovart et al., 2007; g) Hall et al., 1990; h) Ito et al., 1998; i) Lammertsma et al., 1996; j) Mukherjee et al., 1995; k) Siessmeier et al. 2005.