Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 2;38(6):1651–1661. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp241

Table 3.

Water storage and treatment practices following a 3-year point-of-use water treatment and handwashing intervention, Camotán, Guatemala, 2007

Control
Intervention
RD
Outcome n (%) n (%) (95% CI)a
Water storage practices
    Stores drinking water in home 241 (80.3) 242 (80.7) 0.003 (−0.07 to 0.08)
    Exclusively covered or narrow mouth 182 (60.7) 188 (62.7) 0.020 (−0.06 to 0.10)
    Exclusively covered 174 (58.0) 187 (62.3) 0.043 (−0.04 to 0.12)
Self-reported water treatment
    Any method 63 (21.0) 100 (33.3) 0.123 (0.00 to 0.24)
    Boiling 50 (16.7) 60 (20.0) 0.033 (−0.07 to 0.14)
    SODIS 0 (0.0) 39 (13.0) 0.130 (0.07 to 0.19)
    Chlorine 12 (4.0) 15 5.0) 0.010 (−0.02 to 0.04)
Confirmed water treatmentb
    Any method 10 (3.3) 26 (8.7) 0.053 (0.02 to 0.09)
    Boiling 8 (2.7) 15 (5.0) 0.023 (0.00 to 0.05)
    SODIS 0 (0.0) 11 (3.7) 0.037 (0.01 to 0.06)
    Chlorine 2 (0.7) 3 (1.0) 0.003 (−0.01 to 0.02)

a95% CI calculated by bootstrap resampling matched village pairs with 1000 iterations.

bWater treatment was confirmed if the family (i) self-reported treating water in the previous 7 days, (ii) had treated water at the time of the interview and (iii) could produce the materials they used to treat water.

n = 300 intervention and n = 300 control households.