Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 2;38(6):1651–1661. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp241

Table 4.

Handwashing and hygiene conditions following a 3-year point-of-use water treatment and handwashing intervention, Camotán, Guatemala, 2007

Control
Intervention
RD
Outcome n (%) n (%) (95% CI)a
Self-reported handwashingb
    Before cooking 243 (81.0) 232 (77.3) −0.037 (−0.11 to 0.04)
    Before eating 100 (33.3) 101 (33.7) 0.003 (−0.09 to 0.09)
    Before feeding children 61 (20.3) 49 (16.3) −0.040 (−0.14 to 0.06)
    After defaecation 157 (52.3) 152 (50.7) −0.017 (−0.12 to 0.09)
    After changing baby 38 (12.7) 38 (12.7) 0.000 (−0.10 to 0.10)
Spot-check observations
    Mother's hands are clean 271 (90.3) 267 (89.0) −0.013 (−0.07 to 0.04)
    Mother's nails are clean 220 (73.3) 216 (72.0) −0.013 (−0.10 to 0.08)
    Can produce a bar of soap 266 (88.7) 275 (91.7) 0.030 (−0.05 to 0.11)
    Bar of soap is in plain view 170 (56.7) 177 (59.0) 0.023 (−0.07 to 0.12)
    Food is covered 160 (53.3) 167 (55.7) 0.023 (−0.11 to 0.16)
    Garbage present inside home 173 (57.7) 142 (47.3) −0.103 (−0.23 to 0.02)
    Feces observed in living area 211 (70.3) 231 (77.0) 0.067 (−0.05 to 0.18)

a95% CI calculated by bootstrap resampling matched village pairs with 1000 iterations.

bResponses to an open-ended question about handwashing in the 24 h before the interview.

n = 300 intervention and n = 300 control households.