Skip to main content
. 2009 Sep 30;83(24):12917–12924. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01022-09

TABLE 2.

Posterior distributions of tMRCAs for each subtype data seta

Subtype/CRF tMRCA HPD for pol
tMRCA HPD for env
Mean Upper value Lower value Mean Upper value Lower value
CRF01_AE 1,975.5 1,980.5 1,970.3 1,975.9 1,980.6 1,970.6
CRF02_AG 1,976.3 1,981.4 1,970.5 1,975.1 1,980.0 1,969.0
A1 1,954.2 1,967.7 1,939.7 1,954.6 1,968.7 1,940.3
B 1,960.3 1,968.5 1,950.6 1,959.2 1,966.5 1,950.9
B (full genome) 1,966.1 1,972.3 1,959.4 1,965.3 1,970.6 1,959.7
C 1,952.3 1,963.4 1,940.2 1,952.0 1,962.3 1,939.9
C (full genome) 1,955.3 1,971.8 1,933.9 1,955.0 1,971.5 1,934.4
D with prior 1,946.7 1,955.5 1,938.0 1,944.4 1,952.2 1,935.4
D without prior 1,857.0 1,932.8 1,751.0 1,854.1 1,931.2 1,749.9
G 1,969.7 1,978.3 1,959.9 1,969.3 1,977.3 1,959.9
a

The tMRCA was estimated using MCMC analysis, using the software BEAST. For all subtypes, the BSP method with a log normal relaxed-clock assumption was used, except for the pol data set of subtype D, where the exponential-growth demographic model was used instead of BSP. HPD, highest posterior density interval.