Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Dec 2.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007 Mar;31(3):467–476. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00334.x

Table 2.

Association between alcohol intake and breast cancer risk in Washington County, Maryland

Alcohol Intake Cases
N = 321
Median
(grams/week)
(10th, 90th ,pctile1)
Controls
N= 321
Median
(grams/week)
(10th, 90th ,pctile1)
Adj. O.R.2,
95% CI3
Total
   Non-drinkers 167 0 187 0 1.00 (ref)
   Drinkers 95 13.0 (4.5, 135.9) 76 18.0 (4.5, 104.1) 1.40 (0.97,2.03)
   Missing 59 58
Pre-menopausal at
BC4 diagnosis
   Non-drinkers 26 0 35 0 1.00 (ref.)
   Drinkers 15 6.5 (4.5, 106.8) 9 17.5 (4.5, 52.8) 2.69 (1.00,7.26)
   Missing 9 8
Post-menopausal
at BC4 diagnosis
   Non-drinkers 141 0 152 0 1.00 (ref.)
   Drinkers 80 13.0 (4.5, 139.1) 67 18.5 (4.5, 166.3) 1.25 (0.84,1.87)
   Missing 50 50
P interaction = 0.16
Estrogen receptor5
negative
   Non-drinkers 25 0 30 0 1.00 (ref.)
   Drinkers 19 11.0 (4.5, 105.8) 14 12.8 (4.5, 102.5) 1.84 (0.75,4.51)
   Missing
Estrogen receptor
positive
   Non-drinkers 112 0 129 0 1.00 (ref.)
   Drinkers 64 14.8 (4.5, 142.3) 48 23.5 (4.5, 174.1) 1.47 (0.93, 2.31)
   Missing
P interaction = 0.75
1

pctile = percentile.

2

O.R. = Odds ratios, adjusted for matching factors (baseline menopausal status and age).

3

CI = Confidence Interval.

4

BC = breast cancer; women ≤ 51 were categorized as pre-menopausal and women > 51 as post-menopausal in women in whom menopausal status at diagnosis was unknown; 51 cases and controls missing information on estrogen receptor status and therefore the cases and controls do not add up to 321.