Skip to main content
. 2008 Apr 15;60(1):72–79. doi: 10.3138/physio/60/1/72

Table 3.

Regression Analysis Statistics Explaining Variation in Pain-Free Range of Motion, Strength, and Total Objective Component of the CMS by Each Patient-Report Measure

F-Ratio R2 Parameter Estimate* (CI)
Predictor Variable (ASES)
    ROM 15.39 28% 0.23 (0.11−0.36)
    Strength 12.46 23% 0.15 (0.06−0.24)
    Total objective CMS 24.43 38% 0.39 (0.23−0.55)
Predictor Variable (UEFI)
    ROM 16.96 30% 0.24 (0.12−0.36)
    Strength 3.61 8% 0.09 (−0.01−0.18)
    Total objective CMS 15.34 28% 0.33 (0.16−0.50)
Predictor Variable (WORC)
    ROM 9.08 18% 0.16 (0.05−0.27)
    Strength 8.61 17% 0.11 (0.03−0.18)
    Total objective CMS 14.68 26% 0.28 (0.13−0.42)
Predictor Variable (RCQOL)
    ROM 2.99 7% 0.09 (−0.01−0.21)
    Strength 3.01 6% 0.06 (−0.01−0.14)
    Total objective CMS 4.64 10% 0.17 (0.01−0.32)

CMS = Constant-Murley score; ASES = American Shoulder & Elbow Score; WORC = Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index; UEFI = Upper Extremity Functional Index; RC-QOL = Rotator Cuff Quality of Life Score; ROM = range of motion

*Parameter estimates are the estimates of predictor variables.