Skip to main content
. 2009 Oct 28;24(12):1303–1310. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1147-x

Table 2.

Effects of VDIS Intervention on Laboratory Outcomes at Censoring

Outcome Control Intervention Unadjusted effecta Adjusted effect (CI)b Pb
On-time testing (complete data; n = 7,412)
A1C 55% 56% OR = 1.06 1.17 (0.80, 1.72) 0.43
Lipids 71% 74% OR = 1.17 1.39 (1.08, 1.80) 0.012
Creatinine 80% 84% OR = 1.26 1.40 (1.06, 1.84) 0.018
Urine protein 32% 40% OR = 1.41 1.74 (1.13, 2.69) 0.012
Physiologic control (non-imputed; n = 4,998 for A1C; n = 5,450 for LDL)
Mean A1C (%) 7.01 7.16 AD = +0.16 +0.12 (−0.01, +0.25) 0.08
Mean LDL (mg/dl) 93.4 93.5 AD = −0.1 +0.4 (−2.2, +3.1) 0.74
A1C <7% 59% 54% OR = 0.82 0.84 (0.66, 1.08) 0.18
LDL <100 mg/dl 63% 64% OR = 1.04 1.04 (0.87, 1.23) 0.68
Physiologic control (imputed data; n = 7,412)
Mean A1C (%) 7.10 7.25 AD = +0.15 +0.10 (−0.05, +0.24) 0.17
Mean LDL (mg/dl) 95.8 95.0 AD = −0.8 +0.2 (−2.5, +3.0) 0.86
A1C <7% 59% 54% OR = 0.82 0.84 (0.66, 1.08) 0.18
LDL <100 mg/dl 63% 64% OR = 1.07 1.04 (0.88, 1.23) 0.65

aOR = odds ratio; AD = absolute difference (Intervention–Control)

bLogistic or linear regression adjusted for baseline patient value, baseline practice performance, and clustering within practices, with 95% confidence intervals