Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2009 Mar 12;50(1):96–100. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2009.02.006

Table 3.

Statistics used in determining the optimal cutoff value on the mini-PPT for predicting functional status on the original PPT

CDR = 0, Validation CDR = 0.5 CDR = 1
Cutoff = 11 = 12 = 13 = 11 = 12 = 13 = 11 = 12 = 13
Sensitivity 95% CI 0.94 0.86 0.67 0.91 0.78 0.57 0.98 0.75 0.53
0.90–0.98 0.81–0.91 0.60–0.74 0.87–0.95 0.72–0.84 0.50–0.64 0.94–1.02 0.64–0.87 0.39–0.66
Specificity 95% CI 0.75 0.90 0.97 0.76 0.90 0.97 0.77 0.94 0.99
0.67–0.83 0.85–0.96 0.94–1.00 0.70–0.81 0.87–0.94 0.95–0.99 0.70–0.84 0.90–0.98 0.98–1.01
PPV 0.83 0.92 0.96 0.74 0.86 0.94 0.63 0.83 0.97
0.78–0.89 0.88–0.96 0.93–1.00 0.69–0.80 0.81–0.91 0.90–0.98 0.52–0.73 0.73–0.94 0.90–1.03
NPV 0.90 0.83 0.69 0.92 0.84 0.75 0.99 0.91 0.84
0.85–0.96 0.77–0.89 0.62–0.76 0.88–0.95 0.80–0.89 0.70–0.80 0.97–1.01 0.86–0.96 0.79–0.90
%CC 86 88 80 82 85 80 83 89 86
%

CC = % correctly classified