Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009 Dec;52(5):636–642. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181b32646

Table 2.

Mean cognitive and motor development scores of HIV-infected children (cohort 1), HIV-uninfected affected children (cohort 2), and control children (cohort 3).

Mean scores* P-values** for Cohort Differences
Cohort 1
HIV
infected
N = 35
Cohort 2
HIV
Affected
N = 35
Cohort 3
Controls
N = 90
Cohort
1 vs.2
vs.3
Cohort
1 vs. 3
Cohort
2 vs. 3
Cohort
1 vs. 2
Cognitive development
 Visit 1 (baseline) 65.8 ± 6.0 74.8 ± 6.0 84.6 ± 3.8 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 0.0060 0.0350
 Visit 2 (6 month) 75.8 ± 6.0 74.9 ± 5.6 87.3 ± 3.8 0.0002 0.0016 0.0004 0.8391
 Visit 3 (12 month) 84.3 ± 7.2 87.6 ± 6.6 96.5 ± 5.0 0.0102 0.0056 0.0345 0.4945
 Mean change from
 visit 1 to 2 (Δ2-1)
10.0 ± 5.7 0.1 ± 5.2 2.6 ± 3.6 ns ns ns ns
 Mean change from
 visit 1 to 3 (Δ3-1)
18.5 ± 7.7 12.8 ± 7.2 11.8 ± 5.2 ns ns ns ns
Motor development
 Visit 1 (baseline) 75.7 ± 4.2 87.2 ± 4.2 97.8 ± 2.6 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 0.0002
 Visit 2 (6 month) 82.4 ± 4.0 91.0 ± 3.8 101.0 ± 2.6 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 0.0026
 Visit 3 (12 month) 90.4 ± 3.8 94.0 ± 3.6 105.0 ± 2.6 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 0.1783
 Mean change from
 visit 1 to 2 (Δ2-1)
6.7 ± 3.8 3.8 ± 3.6 2.7 ± 2.4 0.2134 ns ns ns
 Mean change from
 visit 1 to 3 (Δ3-1)
14.6 ± 4.2 6.8 ± 3.8 7.6 ± 2.8 0.0090 0.0055 0.7323 0.0063
*

Statistical estimate of the mean obtained from the linear mixed-effects model and 95% CI

**

Model-based p-value for F-test. Type I error controlled by hierarchical testing. P-values significant at 0.05 level.

#

“ns” indicates a non-significant result due to a preceding non-significant test in the hierarchical sequence of hypothesis testing; e.g., cohorts 1 and 3 (sub-hypothesis) cannot be different if it is true that cohorts 1, 2 and 3 (overall hypothesis) are all the same.