Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Reprod Immunol. 2009 Oct 21;83(1-2):185–189. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2009.08.007

Impact of T. Vaginalis Infection on Innate Immune Responses and Reproductive Outcome

Raina N Fichorova 1
PMCID: PMC2788009  NIHMSID: NIHMS149549  PMID: 19850356

Abstract

Trichomonas vaginalis is the most common non-viral sexually transmitted pathogen. The infection is prevalent in reproductive age women and is associated with vaginitis, endometritis, adnexitis, pyosalpinx, infertility, preterm birth, low birth weight, bacterial vaginosis, and increased risk of cervical cancer, HPV, and HIV infection. In men, its complications include urethritis, prostatitis, epididymitis, and infertility through inflammatory damage or interference with the sperm function. The infection is often asymptomatic and recurrent despite the presence of specific antibodies, suggesting the importance of the innate immune defense. T. vaginalis adhesion proteins, cysteine proteases, and the major parasite lipophosphoglycan (LPG) play distinct roles in the pathogenesis and evasion of host immunity. LPG plays a key role in the parasite adherence and signaling to human vaginal and cervical epithelial cells, which is at least in part mediated by galectins. The epithelial cells respond to T. vaginalis infection and purified LPG by selective upregulation of proinflammatory mediators. At the same time, T. vaginalis triggers an immunosuppressive response in monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells. The molecular mechanisms underlying reproductive complications and epidemiologic risks associated with T. vaginalis infection remain to be elucidated.

Keywords: Trichomonas vaginalis, lipophosphoglycan, cytokines, galectins, human vaginal epithelial cells

1. Unique features of T. vaginalis: more than 170 years of history

T. vaginalis is a sexually transmitted extracellular flagellated single-cell parasite that lives in the female lower reproductive tract and the male urethra. Unique genetic and structural features place the parasite at the base of the eukaryotic phylogenetic tree and suggest an intriguing evolution toward mucosal parasitism. T. vaginalis selectively adheres to the human vaginal epithelial cells, surviving for years in the hostile vaginal environment that is typically acidic, contains a plethora of microbicidal innate immune factors, and is reinforced by the presence of a complex commensal bacterial consortium.

T. vaginalis was first recorded in the medical literature more than 170 years ago by a European physician, Alfred Done, who described the trichomonad in human vaginal discharge in 1836. It was then regarded as a harmless inhabitant of the vagina for nearly 80 years until linked to vaginitis (for a more comprehensive review, see (Singh et al., 2007)). Since then the parasite’s morphology and life cycle have been extensively studied, but still little is known about the immunopathogenesis of trichomoniasis and the molecular mechanisms exploited by T. vaginalis to evade the immune system. Some unique features of the parasite include: a huge genome (176,441,227 bp), which is one of the most repetitive known genomes (65%) speculated to emerge from a transition from enteric to urogenital tract environment; utilization of hydrogenosomes instead of mitochondria, which in contrast to mitochondria contain no genetic material; a rare mix of enzymes from both eukaryotic and prokaryotic class; and a unique lipophosphoglycan glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol (GPI) molecule, which has shown compositional similarities with prokaryotic glycoconjugates and plays a major pathogenic and immunoregulatory role (Carlton et al., 2007; Fichorova et al., 2006; Huang et al., 2009; Singh et al., 2009; Vanacova et al., 2003; Zubácová et al., 2008). In addition, T. vaginalis carries viruses and mycoplasma that may be linked to severity of mucosal damage, inflammatory symptoms, and consequences for reproductive outcome (Alderete et al., 1986).

2. Clinical manifestations and impact on reproductive health

In women T. vaginalis causes a wide spectrum of symptoms, ranging from a relatively asymptomatic state to severe inflammation and irritation with foul-smelling vaginal discharge, low abdominal pain, and dysuria. The associated morbidities and complications include vaginitis, endometritis, adnexitis, pyosalpinx, atypical pelvic inflammatory disease, preterm birth, premature membrane rupture, low birth weight, infertility, cervical cancer, enhanced risk of HIV-1 and other viral infections, and a positive association with bacterial vaginosis (McClelland, 2008; Shafir et al., 2009; Singh et al., 2007; Weinstock et al., 2004). Female infants can get infected during birth; infection may remain asymptomatic until puberty (Smith et al., 2002) .

T. vaginalis has been detected in 66–77% of the male partners of infected women, and of those men, about 70% were asymptomatic (Sena et al., 2007). In men the infection, although usually self-limiting and often asymptomatic, is associated with urethritis, prostatitis, epididymitis, reduced sperm function, and infertility (reviewed in (Singh et al., 2007) and (Benchimol et al., 2008) ).

It is important to note that the T. vaginalis infection is often recurrent, with no lasting immunity, suggesting the importance of innate immunity. The choice of treatment since 1960 has been metronidazole; however, resistance to this drug is increasing (Shafir et al., 2009). In addition, the metronidazole treatment is correlated with increased cases of pancreatitis in patients with recurrent trichomoniasis, and metronidazole treatment of symptomatic carriers increases the incidence of preterm birth (Okun et al., 2005).

3. Alarming epidemiologic trends

Worldwide 160 million to 180 million people are infected with T. vaginalis each year, and of those 154 million are in resource-limited settings; 8 million to 10 million are in the United States and 11 million are in Europe (McClelland, 2008). The incidence of T. vaginalis infection occurs more than Chlamydia and gonorrhea put together. In the United States the prevalence among women ranges from 2.8% in adolescents nationwide to 51% in some black communities (Shafir et al., 2009). In men statistics is less reliable although high prevalence (58%) has been reported in young inner city black men (Shafir et al., 2009). Worldwide estimates may be “underestimates” since they have been largely based on wet mount microscopy, which has 35–82% sensitivity as compared to a more sensitive culture technique or PCR diagnostics (Caliendo et al., 2005; Shafir et al., 2009). Also, current statistics may not represent the general population, as infection is asymptomatic in at least one-third of women and most men. An alarming fact is the high prevalence of trichomoniais recorded in otherwise healthy asymptomatic women: one-fifth of asymptomatic women attending Family Planning clinic in South Africa (Johnson et al., 2005) and 47% in the general population attending an obstetrics and gynecology clinic in India (Yadav et al., 2005). Hence, trichomoniasis is the most common non-viral sexually transmitted infection and has reached the level of a global epidemic.

The public health importance of the problem is underscored by the fact that the trichomonas infection is prevalent in reproductive age women with serious adverse reproductive outcomes (McClelland, 2008). The infection is on the rise in adolescents (Van Der Pol et al., 2005; Weinstock et al., 2004).

4. Immunoinflammatory responses to T. vaginalis infection in pregnant women

The immunoinflammatory response to trichomoniasis has been most studied in pregnant women. T. vaginalis positive pregnant women with bacterial vaginosis (Nugent 7–10) had increased vaginal IL-1β and neutrophils compared with bacterial vaginosis alone (Cauci and Culhane, 2007). Increased cervical IL-8 and alpha-defensin have been found in pregnant infected women (Simhan et al., 2007). At the same time in symptomatic women, anti-inflammatory mediators such as the soluble leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI) were lower (possibly due to digestion by trichomonas cysteine proteases) and reactive nitrogen intermediates were higher (Al-Mohammed and Hussein, 2006; Draper et al., 1998). The presence of increased C-reactive protein in the sera of T. vaginalis-infected pregnant women suggests that the impact of the immunoinflammatory reaction to the parasite exceeds the boundaries of the reproductive tract mucosa (Simhan et al., 2007). Mechanisms of pregnancy complications linked to T. vaginalis remain elusive. The complex interactions between T. vaginalis, the vaginal microflora and the host may hold the key to these complications and must be addressed by future clinical and experimental investigations.

5. Modeling the infection and immunity in vivo and in vitro

The immunoinflammatory responses to T. vaginalis infection have been studied in vitro and in mouse models. In vitro experimentation has been conducted with cervical and vaginal epithelial cells (Bastida-Corcuera et al., 2005; Fichorova et al., 2006; Kucknoor et al., 2005a; Kucknoor et al., 2005b; Kucknoor et al., 2007; Okumura et al., 2008; Singh et al., 2009; Sommer et al., 2005), and with various immune cell types (Chang et al., 2006a; Chang et al., 2004; Ryu et al., 2004; Shaio et al., 1995). Both proinflammatory and immunosuppressive responses have been observed as discussed below.

Mice challenged with asymptomatic compared with symptomatic T. vaginalis isolates responded by increased IgA, IgG, Th1 cytokines, and production of reactive nitrogen intermediates (Malla et al., 2007). Both circulating and mucosal antibodies have been detected in women (Kaur et al., 2008); however, the immunity is not lasting, and it has been shown that T. vaginalis cysteine proteases present in the serum and vaginal secretions of symptomatic women can degrade IgG, IgM, and IgA (Yadav et al., 2007). In addition, the T. vaginalis cysteine proteases including CP30, induce apoptosis in vaginal epithelial cells (Sommer et al., 2005) and in multiple mucosal immune cell types (discussed below).

In leukocyte culture, T. vaginalis stimulated IL-8, leukotrienes, reactive nitrogen intermediates, and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) (Ryu et al., 2004; Shaio et al., 1995). T. vaginalis has been shown to produce leukotrienes capable of activating the host cells (Shaio et al., 1992). In T cells, macrophages, and dendritic cells, T. vaginalis led to apoptosis and production of immunosuppressive cytokines (IL-10, TGFβ) (Chang et al., 2004). T. vaginalis proteins (adhesins and CP30) induce caspase-mediated apoptosis and immunosuppressive cytokine response (Chang et al., 2006a). T. vaginalis-induced apoptosis in neutrophils has been linked to caspase-3 activation and reduced expression of the anti-apoptotic protein myeloid cell leukemia sequence 1 (Mcl-1) (Kang et al., 2006), and in macrophages it has been linked to extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK) activation (Chang et al., 2006b). T. vaginalis infection has been shown to activate toll-like receptors (TLR)-4 by inducing undefined substance(s) released in the vaginal secretions (Zariffard et al., 2004). To date, trichomonad ligands for TLR4 have not been identified. T. vaginalis has been reported to induce COX-2 expression and TLR2, 4, and 9 upregulation via the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway (Chang et al., 2006a). Host receptors mediating these effects remain elusive.

The human cervical and vaginal epithelial cells represent the most physiologic model for the study of the T. vaginalis infection because they are the host cells supporting the parasite adherence, survival, and replication in the genital tract. Immortalized human vaginal and cervical epithelial cell lines have been generated and used for modeling the epithelial immune response and inflammatory reaction (Fichorova et al., 1997). This experimental model has yielded important information on the species specificity of T. vaginalis-induced infection and the molecular mechanisms of host-parasite interaction discussed below (Bastida-Corcuera et al., 2005; Fichorova et al., 2006; Okumura et al., 2008; Singh et al., 2009). T. vaginalis adhesion to the human vaginal epithelial cells is species specific and capable of inducing gene upregulation not only in the host (Fichorova et al., 2006; Kucknoor et al., 2005a) but also in the parasite (Kucknoor et al., 2005b).

6. The T. vaginalis lipophosphoglycan – functional domains and innate immunity mechanisms

The T. vaginalis lipophosphoglycan (LPG) has become the focus of extensive studies ever since it was discovered that it is the most abundant glycoconjugate on the parasite surface (2–3 × 106 copies/parasite) and is responsible for the parasite adherence to the vaginal epithelial cells (Singh et al., 2007). It is a pure carbolipid (no peptide component) anchored on the parasite surface via inositol-phosphoceramide. Unlike LPG from other parasites (Leishmania), Trichomonas LPG does not undergo structural changes during parasite development (Singh et al., 2007). A dose-response relationship between T. vaginalis LPG and the parasite adherence has been observed (Fichorova et al., 2006). LPG-truncated mutants express reduced adherence to human ectocervical epithelial cells (Bastida-Corcuera et al., 2005). T. vaginalis LPG triggers species-specific inflammatory response and selective chemokine (IL-8 and macrophage inflammatory protein-3α) upregulation by human cervical and vaginal epithelial cells in a TLR-4 independent fashion (Fichorova et al., 2006).

The structure and composition of T. vaginalis LPG have been recently revealed and specific LPG domains have been linked to its proinflammatory properties (Singh et al., 2009). Mild acid and consecutive enzymatic treatment has led to the isolation and characterization of the outer branch saccharide and the ceramide phospho-inositol glycan core (CPI-GC) of T. vaginalis LPG. It was determined that LPG signals via its CPI-GC core since CPI-GC, with purity confirmed by mass spectrometry, induced a significant upregulation of IL-8 at the protein and mRNA level at concentrations equivalent to multiplicity of infection of 1–4 parasites per epithelial cells. LPG and its CPI-GC core activated NFκB, ERK1/2, and MEK1/2 (Singh et al., 2009).

Recent comprehensive compositional and structural analysis of T. vaginalis revealed that LPG CPI-GC contains terminal poly-N-acetyllactosamine repeats that represent the ligand for the animal lectins called galectins (Singh et al., 2009). It has been observed that galectins-1 and -3 are expressed by the normal human cervical and vaginal epithelial cells and are capable of binding purified LPG (Fichorova et al., 2008). A recent study showed that galectin-1 mediates adherence to cervical epithelial cells (Okumura et al., 2008). T. vaginalis chemical mutants with truncated LPG (reduced Gal and GlcN) showed reduced binding to cervical epithelial cells compared with wild-type parasites. Exogenous galectin-1 enhanced adhesion to cervical epithelial cells. The cross-linking properties of the dimeric galectin-1 form contributes to high avidity T. vaginalis binding (Okumura et al., 2008). Vaginal epithelial cells released galectin-1 and galectin-3 upon T. vaginalis infection, and these galectins modulated the vaginal epithelial cell inflammatory responses (Fichorova et al., 2008).

The galectins represent an evolutionarily conserved family of glycoproteins that contain one or two carbohydrate-recognition domains with affinity for galactose-containing oligosaccharides (β-galactosides) (Rabinovich and Gruppi, 2005). Galectin-3 is unique in that it contains one carbohydrate-recognition domain and one non-carbohydrate-recognition domain binding site. The intracellular galectins (such as galectin-3) regulate pre-mRNA splicing transported to the nucleus for transcriptional regulation. Galectins can also be membrane-bound or secreted, and on the cell surface they cross-link glycoconjugates involved in cell adhesion, proliferation, apoptosis, and multiple immune functions (Rabinovich and Gruppi, 2005). Galectin-1 and galectin-3 have been reported to have opposing immune functions, galectin-1 suppressing and galectin-3 enhancing leukocyte responses to inflammatory stimuli (Nieminen et al., 2008; Rabinovich and Gruppi, 2005).

Galectin-1 and galectin-3 play distinct roles in HIV infection. Galectin-1 promotes viral attachment (Mercier et al., 2008). HIV-1 alters cell surface glycosylation, which promotes galectin-1 binding (Lanteri et al., 2003). HIV-1 Tat, which is essential for viral replication and regulates cytokine expression, enhances galectin-3 expression in infected cells (Fogel et al., 1999). Multiple members of the galectin family have been recently implicated in the female reproductive function (Than et al., 2008a; Than et al., 2008b). Thus, the T. vaginalis LPG interaction with galectins may be part of the molecular mechanisms of increased risk of HIV-1 infection and reproductive problems associated with trichomoniasis.

8. Future directions

Future studies are needed to identify the host receptors and the host’s as well as parasite’s pathways involved in the symptomatic and asymptomatic sequelae and immune evasion by T. vaginalis. The mechanisms of the synergistic interactions between T. vaginalis and bacterial vaginosis, the most common vaginal syndrome of reproductive age women, are virtually unknown. More research is needed to understand and prevent the negative impact of T. vaginalis on women’s reproductive health and the risk of other sexually transmitted diseases.

Acknowledgments

The work on T. vaginalis immunobiology in the author’s laboratory has been supported by NIH/NICHD grants R21HD054451-01 and R21HD054451-02 with continued support by NIH/NIAID R01AI079085-01A2. The author would like to acknowledge the collaboration of her laboratory with the laboratories of Dr. B.N. Singh (SUNY Upstate Medical University, NY, USA), and Dr. C. Costello (Boston University School of Medicine, MA, USA), which have played a significant role in elucidating the molecular structure and lectin-binding properties of T. vaginalis LPG. The author apologizes for not being able to cite more original articles due to journal space limitations.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  1. Al-Mohammed HI, Hussein EM. Comparison between secretory leukocytic protease inhibitor and reactive nitrogen intermediates levels in cervicovaginal secretions from symptomatic and asymptomatic trichomoniasis Egyptians patients. J Egypt Soc Parasitol. 2006;36:763–777. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alderete JF, Kasmala L, Metcalfe E, Garza GE. Phenotypic variation and diversity among Trichomonas vaginalis isolates and correlation of phenotype with trichomonal virulence determinants. Infect Immun. 1986;53:285–293. doi: 10.1128/iai.53.2.285-293.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bastida-Corcuera FD, Okumura CY, Colocoussi A, Johnson PJ. Trichomonas vaginalis lipophosphoglycan mutants have reduced adherence and cytotoxicity to human ectocervical cells. Eukaryot Cell. 2005;4:1951–1958. doi: 10.1128/EC.4.11.1951-1958.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Benchimol M, de Andrade Rosa I, da Silva Fontes R, Burla Dias AJ. Trichomonas adhere and phagocytose sperm cells: adhesion seems to be a prominent stage during interaction. Parasitol Res. 2008;102:597–604. doi: 10.1007/s00436-007-0793-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Caliendo AM, Jordan JA, Green AM, Ingersoll J, Diclemente RJ, Wingood GM. Real-time PCR improves detection of Trichomonas vaginalis infection compared with culture using self-collected vaginal swabs. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2005;13:145–150. doi: 10.1080/10647440500068248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Carlton JM, Hirt RP, Silva JC, Delcher AL, Schatz M, Zhao Q, et al. Draft genome sequence of the sexually transmitted pathogen Trichomonas vaginalis. Science. 2007;315:207–212. doi: 10.1126/science.1132894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cauci S, Culhane JF. Modulation of vaginal immune response among pregnant women with bacterial vaginosis by Trichomonas vaginalis, Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and yeast. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196(133):e131–e137. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.08.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chang J-H, Park J-Y, Kim S-K. Dependence on p38 MAPK signalling in the up-regulation of TLR2, TLR4 and TLR9 gene expression in Trichomonas vaginalis-treated HeLa cells. Immunology. 2006a;118:164–170. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2006.02347.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chang JH, Kim SK, Choi IH, Lee SK, Morio T, Chang EJ. Apoptosis of macrophages induced by Trichomonas vaginalis through the phosphorylation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase that locates at downstream of mitochondria-dependent caspase activation. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2006b;38:638–647. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2005.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chang JH, Ryang YS, Morio T, Lee SK, Chang EJ. Trichomonas vaginalis inhibits proinflammatory cytokine production in macrophages by suppressing NFkappaB activation. Mol Cells. 2004;18:177–185. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Draper D, Donohoe W, Mortimer L, Heine RP. Cysteine proteases of Trichomonas vaginalis degrade secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor. J Infect Dis. 1998;178:815–819. doi: 10.1086/515366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fichorova RN, Rheinwald JG, Anderson DJ. Generation of papillomavirus-immortalized cell lines from normal human ectocervical, endocervical, and vaginal epithelium that maintain expression of tissue-specific differentiation proteins. Biol Reprod. 1997;57:847–855. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod57.4.847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fichorova RN, Trifonova RT, Gilbert RO, Costello CE, Hayes GR, Lucas JJ, et al. Trichomonas vaginalis lipophosphoglycan triggers a selective upregulation of cytokines by human female reproductive tract epithelial cells. Infect Immun. 2006;74:5773–5779. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00631-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fichorova RN, Trifonova RT, Singh BN. T. vaginalis LPG regulates cytokine responses via binding galectins on human vaginal epithelial cells. Microbicides 2008, New Delhi India. 2008 [Google Scholar]
  15. Fogel S, Guittaut M, Legrand A, Monsigny M, Hebert E. The tat protein of HIV-1 induces galectin-3 expression. Glycobiology. 1999;9:383–387. doi: 10.1093/glycob/9.4.383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Huang K-Y, Chien K-Y, Lin Y-C, Hsu W-M, Fong IK, Huang P-J, et al. A proteome reference map of Trichomonas vaginalis. Parasitol Res. 2009;104:927–933. doi: 10.1007/s00436-008-1274-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Johnson LF, Coetzee DJ, Dorrington RE. Sentinel surveillance of sexually transmitted infections in South Africa: a review. Sex Transm Infect. 2005;81:287–293. doi: 10.1136/sti.2004.013904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kang JH, Song HO, Ryu JS, Shin MH, Kim JM, Cho YS, et al. Trichomonas vaginalis promotes apoptosis of human neutrophils by activating caspase-3 and reducing Mcl-1 expression. Parasite Immunol. 2006;28:439–446. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2006.00884.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kaur S, Khurana S, Bagga R, Wanchu A, Malla N. Antitrichomonas IgG, IgM, IgA, and IgG subclass responses in human intravaginal trichomoniasis. Parasitol Res. 2008;103:305–312. doi: 10.1007/s00436-008-0971-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kucknoor A, Mundodi V, Alderete JF. Trichomonas vaginalis adherence mediates differential gene expression in human vaginal epithelial cells. Cell Microbiol. 2005a;7:887–897. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00522.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kucknoor AS, Mundodi V, Alderete JF. Adherence to human vaginal epithelial cells signals for increased expression of Trichomonas vaginalis genes. Infect Immun. 2005b;73:6472–6478. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.10.6472-6478.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kucknoor AS, Mundodi V, Alderete JF. The proteins secreted by Trichomonas vaginalis and vaginal epithelial cell response to secreted and episomally expressed AP65. Cell Microbiol. 2007;9:2586–2597. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.00979.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lanteri M, Giordanengo V, Hiraoka N, Fuzibet J-G, Auberger P, Fukuda M, et al. Altered T cell surface glycosylation in HIV-1 infection results in increased susceptibility to galectin-1-induced cell death. 2003;13:909–918. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwg110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Malla N, Yadav M, Gupta I. Kinetics of serum and local cytokine profile in experimental intravaginal trichomoniasis induced with Trichomonas vaginalis isolates from symptomatic and asymptomatic women. Parasite Immunol. 2007;29:101–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2006.00914.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. McClelland RS. Trichomonas vaginalis infection: can we afford to do nothing? J Infect Dis. 2008;197:487–489. doi: 10.1086/526498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mercier S, St-Pierre C, Pelletier I, Ouellet M, Tremblay MJ, Sato S. Galectin-1 promotes HIV-1 infectivity in macrophages through stabilization of viral adsorption. Virology. 2008;371:121–129. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2007.09.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Nieminen J, St-Pierre C, Bhaumik P, Poirier F, Sato S. Role of galectin-3 in leukocyte recruitment in a murine model of lung infection by Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Immunol. 2008;180:2466–2473. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.4.2466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Okumura CY, Baum LG, Johnson PJ. Galectin-1 on cervical epithelial cells is a receptor for the sexually transmitted human parasite Trichomonas vaginalis. Cell Microbiol. 2008;10:2078–2090. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2008.01190.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Okun N, Gronau KA, Hannah ME. Antibiotics for bacterial vaginosis or Trichomonas vaginalis in pregnancy: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:857–868. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000157108.32059.8f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rabinovich GA, Gruppi A. Galectins as immunoregulators during infectious processes: from microbial invasion to the resolution of the disease. Parasite Immunol. 2005;27:103–114. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2005.00749.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ryu JS, Kang JH, Jung SY, Shin MH, Kim JM, Park H, et al. Production of interleukin-8 by human neutrophils stimulated with Trichomonas vaginalis. Infect Immun. 2004;72:1326–1332. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.3.1326-1332.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sena AC, Miller WC, Hobbs MM, Schwebke JR, Leone PA, Swygard H, et al. Trichomonas vaginalis infection in male sexual partners: implications for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44:13–22. doi: 10.1086/511144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Shafir SC, Sorvillo FJ, Smith L. Current issues and considerations regarding trichomoniasis and human immunodeficiency virus in African-Americans. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2009;22:37–45. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00002-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Shaio MF, Lin PR, Lee CS, Hou SC, Tang P, Yang KD. A novel neutrophil-activating factor released by Trichomonas vaginalis. Infect Immun. 1992;60:4475–4482. doi: 10.1128/iai.60.11.4475-4482.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Shaio MF, Lin PR, Liu JY, Yang KD. Generation of interleukin-8 from human monocytes in response to Trichomonas vaginalis stimulation. Infect Immun. 1995;63:3864–3870. doi: 10.1128/iai.63.10.3864-3870.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Simhan HN, Anderson BL, Krohn MA, Heine RP, Martinez de Tejada B, Landers DV, et al. Host immune consequences of asymptomatic Trichomonas vaginalis infection in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196(59):e51–e55. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.08.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Singh BN, Hayes GR, Lucas JJ, Sommer U, Viseux N, Mirgorodskaya E, et al. Structural details and composition of Trichomonas vaginalis lipophosphoglycan in relevance to the epithelial immune function. Glycoconj J. 2009;26:3–17. doi: 10.1007/s10719-008-9157-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Singh BN, Lucas JJ, Fichorova RN. Trichomonas vaginalis: Pathobiology and Pathogenesis. In: Khan NA, et al., editors. Emerging Protozoan Pathogens. London, UK: Taylor & Francis Group; 2007. pp. 411–455. [Google Scholar]
  39. Smith LM, Wang M, Zangwill K, Yeh S. Trichomonas vaginalis infection in a premature newborn. J Perinatol. 2002;22:502–503. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7210714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Sommer U, Costello CE, Hayes GR, Beach DH, Gilbert RO, Lucas JJ, et al. Identification of Trichomonas vaginalis cysteine proteases that induce apoptosis in human vaginal epithelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:23853–23860. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M501752200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Than NG, Erez O, Wildman DE, Tarca AL, Edwin SS, Abbas A, et al. Severe preeclampsia is characterized by increased placental expression of galectin-1. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008a;21:429–442. doi: 10.1080/14767050802041961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Than NG, Kim SS, Abbas A, Han YM, Hotra J, Tarca AL, et al. Chorioamnionitis and Increased Galectin-1 Expression in PPROM - An Anti-Inflammatory Response in the Fetal Membranes? Am J Reprod Immunol. 2008b;60:298–311. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2008.00624.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Van Der Pol B, Williams JA, Orr DP, Batteiger BE, Fortenberry JD. Prevalence, incidence, natural history, and response to treatment of Trichomonas vaginalis infection among adolescent women. J Infect Dis. 2005;192:2039–2044. doi: 10.1086/498217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Vanacova S, Liston DR, Tachezy J, Johnson PJ. Molecular biology of the amitochondriate parasites, Giardia intestinalis, Entamoeba histolytica and Trichomonas vaginalis. Int J Parasitol. 2003;33:235–255. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(02)00267-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Weinstock H, Berman S, Cates W., Jr Sexually transmitted diseases among American youth: incidence and prevalence estimates, 2000. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004;36:6–10. doi: 10.1363/psrh.36.6.04. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Yadav M, Dubey ML, Gupta I, Malla N. Cysteine proteinase 30 (CP30) and antibody response to CP30 in serum and vaginal washes of symptomatic and asymptomatic Trichomonas vaginalis infected women. Parasite Immunology. 2007;29:359–365. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2007.00952.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Yadav M, Gupta I, Malla N. Kinetics of immunoglobulin G, M, A and IgG subclass responses in experimental intravaginal trichomoniasis: prominence of IgG1 response. Parasite Immunology. 2005;27:461–467. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2005.00800.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Zariffard MR, Harwani S, Novak RM, Graham PJ, Ji X, Spear GT. Trichomonas vaginalis infection activates cells through toll-like receptor 4. Clin Immunol. 2004;111:103–107. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2003.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Zubácová Z, Cimburek Z, Tachezy J. Comparative analysis of trichomonad genome sizes and karyotypes. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2008;161:49–54. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2008.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES