Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Dec 11.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Biol. 2009 Sep 24;394(4):747–763. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.09.049

Table 2.

Experimentally determined binding free energy for phenol derivatives

catechol phenol

Phenol analogs ΔGb,exp (Kcal/mol) ΔGb,calc (Kcal/mol) ΔGb,calc(Kcal/mol) PDB IDs
2-propylphenol −5.33 ± 0.05 −6.13 −3.05 3HTB

phenol −5.24 1LI2

5-chloro-2-methylphenol −5.04 ± 0.07 −7.54 −1.32 3HT8

2-ethylphenol −4.57 ± 0.11 −5.15 −1.14 3HT7

2-methylphenol −4.44 ± 0.11 −4.31 −2.55 3HT6

catechol −4.16 ± 0.03 −4.88 1XEP

2-ethoxyphenol −4.02 ± 0.03 −4.16 −4.25 3HU8

2-methoxyphenol > −2.0* −2.76 −3.84 3HT9

Reference ligands are in italics. Free energy of binding determined by ITC at 10°C;

*

indicates the binding free energy was estimated as ΔGb ≥ −2.0. The binding free energies for the six phenol derivatives are shown; for each compound ΔGb,calc was calculated from the predicted relative binding free energy and the experimentally determined ΔGb of the reference compounds catechol or phenol.

The corrected retrospective result for the phenol to catechol transformation is given (described in Results: Analysis of predictions).

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure