Skip to main content
. 2009 Dec 3;10(Suppl 3):S34. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-S3-S34

Table 7.

Evaluation results of AMD-CGA dataset using different sampling strategies with three metrics across ten classification algorithms.

Method Metric Classifier

J48 3NN NB RF5 LOG 1NN 7NN SMO RF10 RBFNet R. Avg.
PSO AUC 0.609 0.559 0.606 0.591 0.566 0.599 0.590 0.572 0.573 0.540 0.581
FMeasure 0.481 0.462 0.489 0.464 0.448 0.485 0.468 0.460 0.465 0.455 0.468
GMean 0.580 0.557 0.572 0.551 0.538 0.576 0.573 0.550 0.545 0.539 0.558

C. Avg. 0.557 0.526 0.556 0.535 0.517 0.553 0.544 0.527 0.528 0.511 0.536

RU AUC 0.569 0.547 0.549 0.594 0.567 0.569 0.579 0.556 0.604 0.570 0.570
FMeasure 0.434 0.457 0.439 0.476 0.453 0.439 0.446 0.417 0.456 0.446 0.446
GMean 0.538 0.556 0.538 0.580 0.551 0.547 0.553 0.523 0.550 0.549 0.549

C. Avg. 0.514 0.520 0.509 0.550 0.524 0.518 0.526 0.499 0.537 0.522 0.522

RO AUC 0.566 0.568 0.565 0.597 0.581 0.569 0.586 0.558 0.576 0.586 0.575
FMeasure 0.394 0.405 0.375 0.442 0.420 0.415 0.407 0.358 0.421 0.428 0.407
GMean 0.523 0.530 0.505 0.564 0.544 0.539 0.537 0.490 0.547 0.555 0.533

C. Avg. 0.494 0.501 0.482 0.534 0.515 0.508 0.510 0.469 0.515 0.523 0.505

Cluster AUC 0.519 0.595 0.560 0.601 0.580 0.580 0.566 0.545 0.581 0.576 0.570
FMeasure 0.306 0.343 0.358 0.357 0.332 0.270 0.301 0.368 0.387 0.339 0.445
GMean 0.499 0.558 0.532 0.566 0.548 0.569 0.546 0.511 0.554 0.548 0.543

C. Avg. 0.441 0.499 0.483 0.508 0.487 0.473 0.471 0.475 0.507 0.488 0.519