Skip to main content
. 2009 Oct 29;26(9-10):503–510. doi: 10.1007/s10815-009-9354-2

Table 3.

Follicle number, oocyte number, follicle:oocyte ratio, maturation rate and fertilization rate in each of the three genotypes for PvuII, XbaI and TA dinucleotide polymorphisms

Genotypes of ESR1, PvuII Genotypes of ESR1, XbaI Genotypes of ESR1,(TA)n repeat
PP (n = 28) Pp (n = 50) pp (n = 26) p value XX (n = 36) Xx (n = 50) xx (n = 18) p value SS (n = 35) SL (n = 50) LL (n = 19) p value
# of follicles Median(Min-max)% 18.5 (15.25–23.00) 19.0 (15.00–23.25) 19.0 (16.00–25.00) 0.579a 18.5 (16.00–23.75) 19.0 (15.00–24.00) 19.0 (16.00–23.25) 0.972a 18.0 (15.00–24.00) 19.5 (16.00–23.00) 19.0 (15.00–24.00) 0.894a
# of collected oocyte Median(Min-max)% 18.5 (14.00–22.00) 17.5 (15.00–22.25) 19.0 (15.00–22.25) 0.812a 18.0 (15.00–22.00) 17.5 (15.00–23.00) 18.5 (15.00–22.00) 0.938a 17.0 (14.00–23.00) 18.0 (16.00–22.25) 19.0 (14.00–22.00) 0.836a
Maturation rate Median(Min-max)% 94.0 (87.09–100.0)b 93.5 (86.76–96.03)c 82.0 (63.38–89.83)b,c p < 0.001a 94.3 (87.84–100.00)d 91.7 (80.75–95.50)e 86.5 (65.00–91.39)d,e p < 0.001a 92.9 (83.33–95.55) 92.5 (85.80–95.59) 86.4 (66.67–92.86) 0.075a
Fertilization rate Median(Min-max)% 86.6 (72.1–94.02)b,f 71.0 (59.58–81.25)f 60.0 (48.86–75.48)b p < 0.001a 84.0 (72.61–94.36)d,g 68.8 (59.58–78.33)g 59.5 (39.78–79.56)d p < 0.001a 80.0 (70.0–92.85)h,j 71.1 (60.0–81.53)i,j 58.8 (40.00–71.43)h,i,j p < 0.001a
# of grade 1–2 embryos Median (Min-max)% 10.0b (6.00–14.00) 9.5c (4.00–16.00) 8.0b,c (4.00–12.00) p < 0.001 9.0 (4.50–17.00) 10.0 (6.00–14.00) 8.5 (3.50–14.00) 0.668 10.0 (7.00–12.00) 12.0 (6.00–17.00) 10.0 (5.00–14.00) 0.772
# of grade 3–4 embryos Median(Min-max)% 6.0b (3.00–10.00) 7.0c (2.00–10.00) 7.5b,c (3.00–11.00) p < 0.001 7.0 (2.00–11.00) 8.0 (2.00–7.00) 8.0 (3.0–15.00) 0.645 6.5 (3.00–10.00) 5.5 (2.00–11.00) 6.0 (2.00–12.00) 0.739
Frequency (%) of clinical pregnancies 35.7 34.0 30.8 0.556k 33.3 36.0 27.8 0.895k 31.4 36.0 31.5 0.712k

aKruskal Wallis test

bSignificant relationship was found between the groups when PP and pp genotypes were compared p < 0.001

cSignificant relationship was found between the groups when Pp and pp genotypes were compared p < 0.001

fSignificant relationship was found between the groups when PP and Pp genotypes were compared p < 0.001

dSignificant relationship was found between the groups when XX and xx genotypes were compared p < 0.001

eSignificant relationship was found between the groups when Xx and xx genotypes were compared p = 0.028

gSignificant relationship was found between the groups when XX and Xx genotypes were compared p < 0.001

hSignificant relationship was found between the groups when SS and LL genotypes were compared p < 0.001

iSignificant relationship was found between the groups when SS and SL genotypes were compared p = 0.011

jSignificant relationship was found between the groups when SL and LL genotypes were compared p = 0.013

kLogistic regression analysis