Table 4.
Cluster Identification Using Latent Class Mixture Model Analysis
| Clusters† |
High-traders n = 31 n (%) |
Low-traders n = 116 n (%) |
No-traders n = 97 n (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Utilities | |||
| 40% Chance of Erectile Dysfunction** | |||
| No-trade | 4 (12.90) | 38 (32.76) | 95 (97.94) |
| .75 to .99 | 5 (16.13) | 76 (65.52) | 1 (1.03) |
| .50 to .74 | 17(54.84) | 2 (1.72) | 0 (0.00) |
| Up to .49 | 5 (16.13) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) |
| 80% Chance of Erectile Dysfunction* | |||
| No-trade | 0 (0.00) | 17 (14.66) | 77 (79.38) |
| .75 to .99 | 7 (22.58) | 82 (70.69) | 19 (19.58) |
| .50 to .74 | 13 (41.94) | 17 (14.66) | 0 (0.00) |
| Up to .49 | 11 (35.48) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) |
| 10% Chance of Incontinence** | |||
| No-trade | 9 (29.03) | 75 (64.66) | 97 (100) |
| .75 to .99 | 11 (35.48) | 41 (35.34) | 0 (0.00) |
| .50 to .74 | 7 (22.58) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) |
| Up to .49 | 3 (9.68) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) |
| 30% Chance of Incontinence* | |||
| No-trade | 2 (6.54) | 22 (18.97) | 90 (92.78) |
| .75 to .99 | 3 (9.68) | 87 (75.00) | 2 (2.06) |
| .50 to .74 | 16 (51.61) | 4 (3.45) | 3 (3.09) |
| Up to .49 | 9 (29.03) | 1 (0.86) | 0 (0.00) |
| 40% Chance of Erectile Dysfunction + 10% Chance of Incontinence** | |||
| No-trade | 1 (3.23) | 7 (6.03) | 57 (58.76) |
| .75 to .99 | 1 (3.23) | 101 (87.07) | 31 (31.96) |
| .50 to .74 | 17 (54.84) | 8 (6.90) | 7 (7.22) |
| Up to .49 | 12 (38.71) | 0 (0.00) | 2 (2.06) |
†P <.0001(based on Bayesian Information Criteria & Lo-Mendell-Rubin Adjusted Test (see Table 3)
** Risk associated with Radiation Therapy
*Risk associated with Radical Prostatectomy.