Table 5.

Association between SNPs and dieback resistance in a set of 68 L. sativa accessions.

Marker	SNP position	p-value	R2 %	Tagged SNPs
LK1457	137	0.00008	29.2	513
	224	0.00001	48.7	235, 236, 251
	318	0.00037	25.9	482
Cntg10044	9	0.00470	19.4
	27	0.00022	24.8
	109*	0.00001	32.3
	170**	0.00300	20.1
	337	0.00085	22.5
	733	0.00001	33.9
QGG19E03	27	0.00001	53.9	46, 525, 574, 594
	355	0.00130	33.0	393, 415, 480, 597, 598
Cntg4252	472	0.00420	22.6	480, 486, 489, 490. 492, 493, 499, 544, 577
Cntg10192	72	0.00001	100.0	54
	100	0.00001	40.9
CLSM9959	77	0.00001	38.0
	242	0.00210	22.7
CLSZ1525	84	0.00498	19.4	100, 102, 144, 236, 250, 258, 279, 309, 399, 400, 402, 457, 464, 483
	89	0.00001	48.6	107, 110, 116, 123, 149, 181, 296
	465	0.00001	33.2
	VNTR***	0.00001	48.8
QGC11N03	42	0.00010	29.8
	50	0.00001	45.0
	448	0.00001	50.4
Cntg11275	7	0.00001	42.5
	431	0.00001	38.0	525, 534, 559, 583, 590, 748, 798, 799
	623	0.00031	27.4	661, 685, 742, 766, 767

Columns indicate markers, SNP position in the marker, the p-value of association, the percent of phenotypic variation explained by the SNP (R² %), and SNPs from the same tag. SNPs with a p-value of ≤ 0.005 are shown, but only those with p ≤ 0.001 are considered to be significant. *, **, and *** denote indel, SFP, and Variable Number of Tandem Repeats (respectively).