Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Dec 7.
Published in final edited form as: Genes Brain Behav. 2008 Jun 2;7(7):705–713. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2008.00406.x

Table 1.

Percent choice during the final 30 choice trials

Delay (% Choice) Probability (% Choice)
Immediate Delayed Certain Uncertain
HAD1 44.9 ± 1.4% 55.1 ± 1.4% 49.2 ± 1.6% 50.8 ± 1.6%
HAD2 48.0 ± 1.4% 52.0 ± 1.4% 47.1 ± 1.1 % 52.9 ± 1.1%
LAD1 45.8 ± 1.0% 54.2 ± 1.0% 47.5 ± 1.3% 52.5 ± 1.3%
LAD2 47.6 ± 1.0% 52.4 ± 1.0% 46.4 ± 1.4% 53.6 ± 1.4%

Data shown are the mean ± SEM percent choice of the noted lever during the final 30 choice trials of delay discounting and probability discounting sessions. This demonstrates that the animals chose each lever with roughly the same frequency over this period, i.e. they had reached an indifference point. HAD1 n = 6, HAD2 n = 6, LAD1 n = 6, LAD2 n = 5.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure