Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Dec 7.
Published in final edited form as: Genes Brain Behav. 2008 Jun 2;7(7):705–713. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2008.00406.x

Table 3.

Nonparametric correlations between experimental measures

DD b DD k PD b PD k 10%
Sucrose
D1
Loco#
D1–D5
Loco#
DD b
DD k .687**
(<.001)
PD b .326
(.129)
.177
(.419)
PD k .241
(.268)
.460*
(.027)
.582**
(.004)
10% Sucrose .498*
(.016)
.600**
(.002)
.093
(.672)
.043
(.847)
D1 Loco# .564
(.071)
.255
(.450)
.364
(.272)
.355
(.285)
.236
(.484)
D1–D5 Loco# .300
(.370)
.227
(.502)
−.245
(.467)
−.109
(.750)
−.209
(.537)
.627*
(.039)

Data shown are Spearman’s rho (p-value).

*

p < 0.05,

**

p < 0.01. Correlations between performance measures that were significant at the p < 0.05 level are indicated by bold type. Abbreviations: PD: probability discounting, DD: delay discounting, 10% Sucrose: the amount of sucrose consumed in g/kg body weight, D1 Loco: locomotor activity on day 1, D1–D5 Loco: locomotor activity on day 5 minus locomotor activity on day 1 (habituation);

#

denotes n = 11, all other n = 23.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure