Table 2.
Logistic regression of always condom use versus condom use less than always in the last 6 months (n = 1,705) 1
| Male (n = 570) | Female (n = 805) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | p-value | 95% CI | OR | p-value | 95% CI | |||
| Binge frequency | 0.96 | 0.11 | 0.91 | 1.01 | 0.97 | 0.37 | 0.92 | 1.03 |
| Maximum consumption | 0.85 | 0.35 | 0.61 | 1.19 | 1.03 | 0.85 | 0.78 | 1.35 |
| Age | 0.75 | <0.01 | 0.69 | 0.81 | 0.87 | <0.01 | 0.82 | 0.93 |
| Sensation seeking | 0.97 | 0.13 | 0.93 | 1.01 | 1.05 | <0.01 | 1.02 | 1.09 |
| Social support | 0.96 | 0.12 | 0.90 | 1.01 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.95 | 1.06 |
| Depression | 0.64 | 0.07 | 0.39 | 1.04 | 0.83 | 0.34 | 0.57 | 1.21 |
| No. of sexual partners | 0.97 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 1.17 | 0.92 | 0.40 | 0.77 | 1.11 |
1,705 of the 1,715 sexually active subjects provided complete information