Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Dec 7.
Published in final edited form as: Chem Senses. 2003 Feb;28(2):173–180. doi: 10.1093/chemse/28.2.173

Table 1.

Subject characteristics of children who preferred 0.25 M citric acid in gelatin (High-Sour group) and those who did not (Low-Sour group)

Preference group based on level of sourness preferred in gelatin
High-Sour group Low-Sour group
Children’s characteristics
 Age (years) 7.6 ± 0.3 7.3 ± 0.2
 Sex (girls:boys) 12:10 17:22
 BMI (kg/m2) 18.2 ± 1.3 16.9 ± 0.5
Temperament measures1
 Shyness 2.2 ± 0.2 2.3 ± 0.1
 Emotionality 2.8 ± 0.2 2.9 ± 0.2
 Sociability 3.7 ± 0.1 3.6 ± 0.1
 Negative reactions to foods 3.0 ± 0.2 3.2 ± 0.1
 Activity 3.5 ± 0.2 3.7 ± 0.1
Percentage who tried sour candies 100.0 73.7*
Percentage who preferred sour candies 95.0 57.9*
Mothers’ characteristics
 Age (years) 36.9 ± 1.2 38.4 ± 1.0
 Food neophobia score2 37.1 ± 2.6 34.3 ± 2.0
 General neophobia score3 21.5 ± 1.4 24.4 ± 1.4
Percentage of mothers who reported child went through a
‘sour phase’
60.0 29.7*
*

Statistically significant differences between groups at P < 0.05.

1

Child temperament measures could range from 1 to 5 (1 = not at all characteristic of the child and 5 = very characteristic of the child (Fisher et al., 2002).

2

The food neophobia score could range from 10 to 70.

3

The general neophobia score could range from 8 to 56.