Table 3.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Users Springa | – | 0.07 | 0.12 | 0.13 | −0.19* | 0.22**b | −0.21** | 0.04 | 0.04 |
2 Social Pref | – | 0.20* | 0.65*** | 0.30*** | 0.37*** | 0.25** | −0.06 | 0.09 | |
3 Social Impact | – | 0.53*** | 0.10 | 0.41*** | 0.15 | 0.13 | 0.21** | ||
4 Popularity | – | 0.25** | 0.55*** | 0.25** | 0.03 | 0.07 | |||
5 Ind. Centr | – | −0.12 | 0.87*** | 0.09 | 0.15 | ||||
6 Grp. Centr | – | −0.06 | −0.06 | 0.15 | |||||
7 Ntwk Centr | – | 0.01 | 0.04 | ||||||
8 Betweeness | – | 0.73*** | |||||||
9 Bonacich | – | ||||||||
Mean | 14.0% | −0.061 | −0.030 | −0.093 | 0.67 | 0.50 | 2.48 | 0.004 | 0.719 |
SD | 0.999 | 1.001 | 0.926 | 0.28 | 0.24 | 0.54 | 0.006 | 0.733 | |
N | 156 | 156 | 156 | 156 | 151 | 151 | 151 | 156 | 156 |
Spearman correlation coefficients are reported for relationships with the dichotomous Users variables. All other values reported are Pearson correlation coefficients.
Preliminary analyses based on sub-samples with limited ns suggest that the relationship between use and group centrality in the spring differs for smoking and drinking, Spearman rs=.09, ns., and .23, p < .01, respectively.
p < .05
p < .01