. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Dec 8.

Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009 Jul 14;28(12):1955–1968. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2009.2026412

TABLE III.

Phantom experiment results.

Num of seeds	Num of images	Number of seeds		Mean ± STD error (mm)
Num of seeds	Num of images	candidate	correctly detected	Mean ± STD error (mm)
42	4	43	42 (100%)	1.7 ± 0.6
	5	42	42 (100%)	1.3 ± 0.5
	6	42	42 (100%)	1.1 ± 0.4
57	4	60	56 (98.3%)	0.8 ± 0.7
	5	58	56 (98.3%)	0.8 ± 0.7
	6	57	57 (100%)	0.8 ± 1.0
72	4	77	72 (100%)	1.2 ± 0.9
	5	74	72 (100%)	1.0 ± 0.4
	6	72	72 (100%)	1.0 ± 0.4
87	4	94	84 (96.6%)	0.7 ± 0.7
	5	96	86 (98.6%)	0.7 ± 0.5
	6	91	86 (98.6%)	0.7 ± 0.4
102	4	119	98 (96.1%)	2.0 ± 0.9
	5	107	102 (100%)	1.1 ± 0.5
	6	104	102 (100%)	1.1 ± 0.5