Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Dec 8.
Published in final edited form as: School Ment Health. 2009 Sep 1;1(3):107–117. doi: 10.1007/s12310-009-9005-x

Table 2.

Corrected Item-Total Correlations, Means (Standard Deviations), and Range of Ratings for the TIQ-FSS and TIQ-CARE

Item Item-Total Correlation Mean (SD) Range of Ratings
TIQ-FSS
1. Teacher was willing to modify homework expectation .51 3.38 (0.71) 1 – 4
2. Teacher was cooperative in making arrangements for school meetings .67 3.77 (0.52) 2 – 4
3. Teacher was interested in working with parent and clinician .86 3.55 (0.72) 1 – 4
4. Teacher was supportive of family involvement in program .67 3.79 (0.51) 2 – 4
5. Teacher provided enough time during meetings .58 3.67 (0.67) 1 – 4
6. Teacher was engaged in discussion about child during meetings .28 3.81 (0.45) 2 – 4
7. Teacher, parent, and clinician worked collaboratively to identify target behaviors .47 3.81 (0.40) 3 – 4
8. Teacher actively participated in development of school-home note .69 3.75 (0.49) 2 – 4
9. Teacher showed interest in child’s progress .67 3.77 (0.52) 2 – 4
10. Teacher recognized the family’s efforts to support the child’s progress .64 3.55 (0.65) 2 – 4
11. Teacher welcomed contact with family outside of school meetings .58 3.48 (0.72) 1 – 4
12. Teacher followed the use of a daily school-home note .14 3.38 (0.79) 1 – 4
13. The teacher-parent-clinician team jointly evaluated intervention implementation .61 3.72 (0.50) 2 – 4
TIQ-CARE
1. Teacher was cooperative in making arrangements for school meetings .79 3.54 (0.86) 1 – 4
2. Teacher was interested in working with parent and clinician .87 3.30 (0.89) 1 – 4
3. Teacher was supportive of family involvement in program .85 3.54 (0.91) 1 – 4
4. Teacher provided enough time during meetings .76 3.56 (0.84) 1 – 4
5. Teacher was engaged in discussion about child during meetings .68 3.70 (0.65) 1 – 4
6. Teacher showed interest in child’s progress .84 3.36 (0.83) 1 – 4
7. Teacher recognized the family’s efforts to support the child’s progress .81 3.20 (1.01) 1 – 4
8. Teacher welcomed contact with family outside of school meetings .83 3.26 (0.97) 1 – 4

Note: TIQ refers to the Teacher Investment Questionnaire. FSS refers to the Family-School Success Program, and CARE refers to the Coping with ADHD through Relationships and Education program. Item wording was shortened for brevity.