Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Dec 8.
Published in final edited form as: Am Heart J. 2005 Jun;149(6):1074–1081. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.08.018

Table II.

Crude reperfusion therapy treatment rates by race and US Census region

US Census regions
Overall Northeast Midwest West South Non-South US
n 204230 39445 56466 41765 66554 137676
Any reperfusion therapy
 Overall 69.6 65.4 69.0 72.5 70.9 69.0
 Black 66.5 67.9 68.3 70.7 64.5 68.8
 White 69.9 65.3 69.0 72.6 71.7 69.0
P <.0001 .032 .39 .11 <.0001 .65
 Racial difference (99% CI) −3.3 (−4.4, −2.2) 2.7 (−0.5, 5.8) −0.7 (−2.9, 1.5) −1.9 (−5.1, 1.2) −7.1 (−8.7, −5.6) −0.3 (−1.8, 1.3)
Thrombolytic agents
 Overall 53.8 59.3 49.6 51.5 55.6 52.9
 Black 52.3 59.9 49.3 54.4 51.5 53.1
 White 53.9 59.3 49.6 51.4 56.0 52.9
P .0004 .66 .79 .028 <.0001 .77
 Racial difference (99% CI) −1.6 (−2.8, −0.4) 0.6 (−2.7, 3.9) −0.2 (−2.6, 2.1) 3.0 (−0.5, 6.5) −4.5 (−6.1, −2.8) 0.2 (−1.5, 1.9)
Percutaneous coronary intervention
 Overall 15.2 5.9 18.7 20.2 14.7 15.5
 Black 13.8 8.0 18.7 15.6 12.5 15.3
 White 15.3 5.8 18.7 20.3 14.9 15.5
P <.0001 .0004 1.00 <.0001 <.0001 .71
 Racial difference (99% CI) −1.5 (−2.3, −0.7) 2.2 (0.4, 4.0) 0.0 (−1.8, 1.9) −4.8 (−7.3, −2.2) −2.4 (33.5, 31.3) −0.2 (−1.4, 1.0)

Treatment rates reported as the proportion of patients who received the therapy.

Racial difference reported as the absolute difference in treatment rates between black patients and white patients with negative numbers indicating lower treatment rates among blacks compared with whites.

P < .0001 or lower for Mantel-Hanzel tests of heterogeneity in effect of race on treatment across 4 US Census regions and for the comparison of the South vs the rest of the United States for all 3 reperfusion therapy endpoints.

Note: Treatment by thrombolytic agents and percutaneous coronary intervention does not equal “any reperfusion therapy ” as 1300 (0.6%) patients who underwent immediate coronary bypass surgery for reperfusion therapy are not reported.