Skip to main content
. 2009 Dec 16;4(12):e8192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008192

Table 2. Female cohorts included in the meta-analysis of birth weight and leisure time physical activity (LTPA).

Country and study Birth- year(s) Age (years) Number of subjects Mean birth weight (kg) LTPA (% active) Definition of LTPA (inactivity)
Denmark
Andersen et al. (2000) 1932–1970 20–50 919 3.3 (0.55)a 73.8 None or very little
Willumsen (1970) 1959–1961 41–43 2160 3.2 (0.56) 49.5 Light physical activity <4 h/wk
Johnsen et al. (2006) 1932–1946 50–64 4363 3.3 (0.59) 72.8 1st quartile of MET-score for walking, cycling, sports, and gardening
Finland
Tammelin et al. (2003) 1966 31 2847 3.5 (0.49) 75.1 Brisk exercise <1 time/wk and light exercise <4 times/wk
Tammelin et al. (2007) 1986 15–16 2911 3.5 (0.51) 60.1 ≤1 h/wk of brisk physical activity
Eriksson et al. (2006) 1934–1944 56–69 1059 3.4 (0.47) 73.5 1st quartile of MET-score for conditioning and non-conditioning exercise
Norway
Holmen et al. (2000) 1975–1981 14–20 2512 3.5 (0.51) 79.3 <1 time/wk and <2 h/wk of at least moderate intensity
Sweden
Rasmussen et al. (2004) 1985–1987 14–16 1214 3.4 (0.54) 66.7 Lowest tertile of energy expenditure
Lissner et al. (1996) 1914–1930 50–66 607 3.5 (0.54) 73.0 Almost completely inactive
a

Numbers in parentheses, standard deviation.