Skip to main content
. 2009 Oct 6;37(21):7206–7218. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp790

Table 2.

Genetic and biochemical classification of LlaGI

Type I Type III Type IIL Type ISP
e.g. EcoR124I e.g. EcoPI e.g. MmeI e.g. LlaGI
Genes/protein
    Genes HsdR, hsdM, hsdS Res, mod RM RM
    Nuclease Complex R2M2S1 Res2Mod2 n.d. RM1 (RM2 for cleavage?)
    Recognition sequence Asymmetric, bipartite GAAnnnnnnRTCG Short, asymmetric AGACC Short, asymmetric, degenerate TCCrAC Short, asymmetric, degenerate CTnGAyG
DNA methylation
    Methylation Both strands One strand One strand One strand
DNA cleavage
    Cofactors ATP, Mg2+, AdoMet ATP, Mg2+ Mg2+ ATP, Mg2+
    Multiple sites required? Yes, Linear DNANo, circular DNA Yes (+AdoMet) No (-AdoMet)a Yes Yes (dsDNA break) No (nicking)
    Sites required in cis? Yes Yes No Yes
    Communication mode 1D 1D 3D 1D
    Preference for site directionality? None Indirect repeatb None Indirect Repeat (head-to-head only)
    Cleavage loci? Non-specific random Non-specific Non-specific Non-specific random
Distant and proximal Fixed proximal Fixed proximal Distant and proximal
Helicase motor activity No helicase domain
    DNA Loop translocation required Yes No Yes
    DNA Supercoiling Yes No Yes
    Directionality Bidirectional (two unidirectional motors per complex) Bidirectionalb Unidirectional
    Translocation rate 463 bp/s (20°C) n.d. 173 ATP/s (20°C)
    ATPase rate 503 ATP/s/motor(20°C) ∼0.2 ATP/s/per complex (20°C) 250 ATP/s (20°C)
    ATP per bp 1–1.5 «1 1.5–2
    Step size 1–2 n.d. n.d.
    Average distance moved per event ∼5000 bp n.d. n.d.
    Motor polarity 3′–5′ n.d. n.d.
    Triplex displacement Yes No Yes

Data for EcoR124I was collated from refs (14,27,35,39–41). Data for EcoPI was collated from refs (30,42–45). Data for MmeI was collated from refs (2,9,34). Data for LlaGI was from this paper and refs. 1,10,11. n.d. is where data is not determined.

aRelaxed cleavage conditions with high enzyme:DNA ratios.

bDogma states that Type III enzymes only cut sites in head-to-head repeat (33) but more recent analysis suggests that tail-to-tail repeats are cut equally well (Kara van Aelst, M.D.S. and Ralf Seidel, unpublished data).