Table 4.
The non-confirmed positives.
| Clone | Status | Validation method |
|---|---|---|
| RP11-114K7 | [24] | |
| RP11-161M6 | [24] | |
| RP1-225D2 | [24] | |
| RP6-14C6 | [24] | |
| RP11-342F21 | [24] | |
| RP11-342F21 | [24] | |
| RP6-22D12 | [24] | |
| RP1-93N13 | Genomic Database of Variants | |
| RP11-2P5 | Single clone deletion | qPCR |
| RP11-48E16 | Single clone deletion | qPCR |
| RP11-127A9 | Single clone deletion | qPCR |
| RP11-469N6 | Single clone deletion | qPCR |
| RP11-576I16 | Single clone duplication | qPCR |
| RP11-152O18 | Single clone deletion | FISH |
| RP11-361M10 | Not confirmed | Lack of DNA |
| RP11-404P12 | Low spot quality | |
| RP5-982E9 | Low spot quality | |
| RP11-301H15 | Low spot quality | |
| RP4-742J24 | Low spot quality | |
Outside the duplicated and deleted regions, 15 reporters were also classified as being completely duplicated or deleted. Eight of them could be confirmed as being polymorphic clones according to [24] and the Genomic Database of Variants. Six of them confirmed with FISH or qPCR. One clone could not be confirmed, due to lack of DNA.