Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Dec 10.
Published in final edited form as: Biometrics. 2007 Sep 26;64(2):538–545. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00884.x

Table 4.

Results from simulation study. Percentage bias, average of the estimated standard errors (SE), empirical standard deviation (ESD), and 95% coverage probabilities are reported for the estimated marginal regression coefficients.

Fittedmodel: MAR
Fittedmodel: latent class
Parameter % bias SE ESD coverage % bias SE ESD coverage
True model: MAR
Intercept 0.1 0.07 0.08 0.86 3.5 0.07 0.08 0.87
IDU –1.1 0.12 0.14 0.91 –1.9 0.12 0.14 0.91
Visit 0.0 0.01 0.01 0.98 –3.2 0.01 0.01 0.93
True model: latent class (M = 2)
Intercept 7.6 0.07 0.07 0.74 8.0 0.07 0.07 0.98
IDU –0.9 0.13 0.16 0.87 –1.6 0.12 0.12 0.94
Visit –582 0.01 0.01 0.00 –26 0.02 0.02 0.91