Skip to main content
. 2009 Oct 5;53:10.3402/fnr.v53i0.2038. doi: 10.3402/fnr.v53i0.2038

Table 1.

Dietary survey methods used for the present study

Country Year Methodology used N Age range, ys References
Denmark 2000–2004 Seven-day pre-coded record 5,885 4–75 (11)
Finland 2002 48-h recall + survey on use of fortified foods, for distribution modelling: Monte Carlo simulation (fortification) and C-SIDE® 2,007 25–64 (12)
Germany 1997–1999 Modified diet history 4,030 18–79 (1316)
2006 Modified diet history (12–17 ys) three-day estimated food diary (6–11 ys) 2,506 6–17
Ireland 1997–1999 Seven-day estimated food diary 1,379 18–64 (17, 18)
2003–2004 Seven-day weighed food diary 594 5–12
Italy 1994–1996 Seven-day record (non-pre-coded food) 1,200 households 2,700 individuals analysed 1,978 individuals (manually checked bad-reporters were excluded) 0–94 (19)
The Netherlands Young adults 2003 Two 24-h recall on non-consecutive days 750 19–30 (20, 21)
Total population 1997/1998 Food record on two consecutive days 5,958 1–95 (22)
Young children 2005/2006 Two diet records on non-consecutive days 639 4–6 (23)
Poland 2000 (September–December) 24-h recall 4,134 1–96 (24)
Spain Adults: 2002–2003 Two 24-h recall on non-consecutive days and a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire 2,160 10–80 (25, 26)
1,613 18–64
Children: 1998–2000 One 24-h recall (a second one in one-third of the sample on a non-consecutive day) 3,534 2–24
1,860 4–17
United Kingdom 1997 Face-to-face interview; seven-day food and supplements diary and seven-day weighed intake 2,127 4–18 (27)
2000–2001 2,251 19–64 (28)