Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Dec 10.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Med Biol. 2009 Oct 9;54(21):6477–6493. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/21/003

Table 2.

Source reconstructed position comparisons between DA and SP3 approximation. (FM: Fine mesh, Multiview; CM: Coarse mesh, Multiview; FS: Fine mesh, Single view; Reconstruction: the center position of reconstructed source; Relative Errors: the absolute distance between the reconstructed and actual positions at X-, Y-, and Z-axis directions; Distance: the absolute distance between the reconstructed and actual positions)

DA
Reconstruction Relative Errors Distance
FM (4, −3, 0) (2.8, −2.6, 2.0) (1.2, 0.4, 2.0) 2.4
(4, −3, 5) (4.1, −4.8, 4.4) (0.1, 1.8, 0.6) 1.9
(4, −3, 10) (3.2, −8.3, 5.2) (0.8, 5.3, 4.8) 7.2

CM (4, −3, 0) (5.9, −4.0, 2.1) (1.9, 1.0, 2.1) 3.0
(4, −3, 5) (2.8, −4.4, 4.2) (1.2, 1.4, 0.8) 2.0
(4, −3, 10) (5.2, −1.8, 8.4) (1.2, 1.2, 1.6) 2.3

FS (4, −3, 0) (4.4, −2.2, 14.2) (0.4, 0.8, 14.2) 14.2
(4, −3, 5) (3.7, −3.5, 14.0) (0.3, 0.5, 14.0) 14.0
(4, −3, 10) (4.6, −2.6, 11.0) (0.6, 0.4, 1.0) 1.2
SP3
Reconstruction Relative Errors Distance

FM (4, −3, 0) (3.7, −2.2, 0.7) (0.3, 0.8, 0.7) 1.1
(4, −3, 5) (4.1, −2.6, 4.7) (0.1, 0.4, 0.3) 0.5
(4, −3, 10) (3.9, −3.2, 9.2) (0.1, 0.2, 0.8) 0.8

CM (4, −3, 0) (5.1, −2.2, 0.2) (1.1, 0.8, 0.2) 1.4
(4, −3, 5) (3.7, −1.3, 4.7) (0.3, 1.7, 0.3) 1.7
(4, −3, 10) (3.7, −4.0, 7.9) (0.3, 1.0, 2.1) 2.3

FS (4, −3, 0) (3.7, −2.6, 0.5) (0.3, 0.4, 0.5) 0.7
(4, −3, 5) (4.2, −3.2, 5.5) (0.2, 0.2, 0.5) 0.6
(4, −3, 10) (4.6, −1.3, 7.9) (0.6, 1.7, 2.1) 2.8