Skip to main content
. 2009 Aug 12;86(6):909–917. doi: 10.1007/s11524-009-9396-x

Table 2.

Comparison of age-adjusted anti-HCV prevalence between NYC HANES and national HANES

NYC HANES NHANES pa
N % Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI N % Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI  
Overall 1,786 2.3 1.5 3.5 4,485 1.8 1.3 2.6 0.59
Sex
 Male 754 2.7 1.6 4.6 2,172 2.1 1.4 3.2 0.66
 Female 1,032 1.9 1.2 3.2 2,313 1.6 1.0 2.5 0.65
Race/ethnicityc
 White, non-Hispanic 524 1.8b 0.8 4.0 2,423 1.7 1.1 2.6 0.96
 Black, non-Hispanic 379 4.3 2.4 7.5 873 3.2 2.3 4.3 0.35
 Asian, non-Hispanic 226 2.4b 0.6 9.2 x x x x
 Hispanic 627 1.4b 0.6 3.4 x x x x
 Other, non-Hispanic x x x x 150 0.4b 0.1 1.9
 Mexican-American x x x x 901 2.1 1.2 3.6
 Hispanic, other than Mexican-American x x x x 138 2.2b 0.9 5.5
Age (in years)
 20–29 476 0.0 817 0.0
 30–39 421 0.6b 0.2 2.3 738 1.0b 0.5 2.2 0.54
 40–49 389 2.5b 1.3 4.8 725 3.6 2.2 5.8 0.35
 50–59 269 5.8 3.3 10.0 551 4.3 2.5 7.1 0.46
 ≥60 231 3.0b 1.5 6.1 1,654 0.8 0.5 1.3 0.05

% Prevalence estimates, weighted and age adjusted using the Year 2000 standard population; N unweighted sample size; x estimate unavailable

ap value for difference between NYC HANES and NHANES

bRelative standard error >30% or denominator <50. Prevalence estimate may be may be unstable and should be interpreted with caution

cOther race not included in NYC HANES estimate due to small sample size