Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Dec;97(6):1097–1114. doi: 10.1037/a0016786

Table 4. Results of the Mega-Analysis: Relationship of Big-Five Trait Standing to Multiple Behavior Summaries.

Behavior Summary Extraversion Agreeableness Conscientious Emot. Stability Intellect
Single State .18*** .34*** .24*** .31*** .37***
Mean .42*** .55*** .48*** .53*** .56***
Median .41*** .52*** .45*** .51*** .55***
Mode .28*** .45*** .33*** .42*** .48***
Semi-Partial Mean
.35*** .43*** .38*** .46*** .51***
Maximum .34*** .42*** .38*** .42*** .54***
Minimum .22* .33*** .32*** .37*** .27***
Variability .09* -.07 -.08 -.23*** .23***
Quadratic Trait predicting
Variability .15** .06 .05 .05 .03
Skew -.24*** -.25*** -.18*** -.28*** -.20***
Kurtosis .08 .19*** .13** .27*** -.02

Note. Table entries are correlations between trait standing and acting the way described by the trait. Each row refers to a different way of summarizing states. Correlations were calculated across up to 15 experience sampling studies combined into one data file (N = 15 studies, 495 participants, and 21,871 occasions). Questionnaire scores, parameters, and single states were centered within study before computing the respective correlations, to eliminate artificial inflation of correlations due to between-study differences. The Mean row shows that traits predict average states stronger than .3 or even .4, ranging from .42 for extraversion to .56 for intellect.

***

p < .001

**

p < .01

*

p < .05