Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Dec 11.
Published in final edited form as: Structure. 2001 Nov;9(11):1095–1106. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(01)00675-x

Table 3.

Crystal, Data Collection, and Phasing Statistics

Crystal
Unit cell a = b = 115.52 Å, c = 78.67 Å, α = β = 90°, γ = 120°
Space group P3121
MW (247 residues) Da 28075
Mol (AU) 2
SeMet (AU) 22

MAD Data Collection Statistics
λ1 (peak) λ (inflection) λ (remote)

λ (Å) 0.9791 0.9793 0.9639
Resolution (Å) 2.0 2.0 2.0
Reflections (measured) 328,134 288,593 234,067
Reflections (unique) 79,278 78,802 75,790
Completeness (%) (outer shell) 100 99.4 95.6
Rmerge1 (overall) 0.126 0.098 0.124
I/σ (overall) 19.4 19.4 9.3
Number of selenium sites 22 22 22
Phasing power2 1.19 1.206 0.6265
FOMMAD3 0.246 0.246 0.157
FOMMAD (overall) 0.442
FOM (sf)4 0.824
1

Rmerge = ΣΣ | Ii – Im |/ ΣΣ Ii, where Ii is the intensity of the measured reflection and Im is the mean intensity of all symmetry-related reflections.

2

Phasing power = FH/ERMS.

FP, FPH, and FH are the protein, derivative, and heavy-atom structure factors, respectively, and ERMS is the residual lack of closure.

3

Figure of merit from MAD phasing.

4

Figure of merit after solvent flipping.