Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008 Dec 19;101(1-2):74–79. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.11.004

Table 2.

Estimated marginal means, odds ratios, and Logit d of drug use outcomes comparing MET vs. TAU at low and high motivation

URICA formula

Estimated marginal means
MET TAU OR Logit d




1 month
Low motivation 0.46 0.54 0.72 -0.18
High motivation 0.67 0.61 1.34 0.16
3 months
Low motivation 0.53 0.50 1.15 0.08
High motivation 0.56 0.61 0.8 -0.12
Self-report goal question

Estimated marginal means
MET TAU OR Logit d




1 month
No quit goal 0.35 0.41 0.76 -0.15
Quit goal 0.54 0.47 1.34 0.16
3 months
No quit goal 0.31 0.48 0.48 -0.40
Quit goal 0.54 0.31 2.53 0.51

Note. Estimated marginal means represent predicted likelihood of being drug-free; OR represents probability that a participant in the MET condition was drug free, as compared to the TAU condition; Logit d is an effect size analog of Cohen's d, for dichotomous outcomes.