Skip to main content
. 2009 Dec 6;2009:937305. doi: 10.1155/2009/937305

Table 2.

Comparison of adverse events of interest in the PACCE and CAIRO2 studies.

PACCE oxaliplatin cohort [43] CAIRO2 [47]
(N = 823) (N = 755)
Ox + Bev + Pmab Ox + Bev Cap, Ox + Bev + Cmab Cap, Ox + Bev
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 3/4 Grade 3/4
Incidence of toxicity, %

Skin toxicity 35 1 1 0 39.1 20.8
Diarrhea 22 2 12 1 26.0 19.1
Infection 16 2 8 2 6.0 6.8
Hypertension 4 0 5 0 9.3 14.8
Hypomagnesemia 3 1 0 0 NR NR
Neuropathy* 3 <1 7 0 7.7 10.4
Nausea/vomiting 13 0 6 1 6.3/6.0* 8.5/8.2*
Deep vein thrombosis 7 0 8 0 NR NR
Pulmonary embolism 0 6 0 4 NR NR
Venous thromboembolic events NR NR NR NR 8.2 6.8
Arterial thromboembolic events NR NR NR NR 2.2 3.3

Bev: bevacizumab; Cap: capecitabine; Cmab: cetuximab; NR: not reported; Ox: oxaliplatin; PACCE: Panitumumab Advanced Colorectal Cancer Evaluation; Pmab: panitumumab.

*Neuropathy events were reported as “sensory neuropathy” in CAIRO2.

The incidence of nausea and vomiting was reported together in PACCE but as separate adverse events in CAIRO2. The first number indicates the reported incidence of nausea and the second number indicates the incidence of vomiting.