Skip to main content
. 2009 Nov 2;27(34):5808–5815. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.21.9766

Table 3.

RRM1 and ERCC1 Protein Levels by Clinical Characteristics

Characteristic Protein Level
RRM1 (n = 69)
ERCC1 (n = 65)
Median Range P Median Range P
Age, years .552 .650
    ≥ 75.0 33.4 8.5-105.6 34.7 5.2-131.3
    < 75.0 34.2 5.3-90.1 35.4 10.1-102.3
Sex .722 .401
    Male 36.1 5.3-105.6 34.4 5.2-127.6
    Female 33.2 8.6-93.5 47.3 11.5-131.3
Histology .570 .893
    Adeno 36.9 5.3-105.6 39.9 5.2-131.3
    Squamous 23.7 9.9-93.5 34.1 6.0-104.9
    Large cell and NOS 34.1 14.7-90.1 27.9 11.5-127.6
Stage .312 .029
    IV 35.1 5.3-105.6 34.4 5.2-127.6
    IIIB 27.2 14.8-36.9 69.7 51.3-131.3
Treatment .196 .610
    Gemcitabine and carboplatin 32.9 6.4-105.6 36.7 12.8-131.3
    Gemcitabine 39.1 5.3-90.1 33.4 5.2-127.6
Best measurable response category by CT .023 .402
    PR 22.9 5.3-81.4 34.6 10.1-84.7
    SD 39.0 8.5-105.6 34.1 5.2-131.3
    PD 42.2 15.2-89.4 51.8 18.7-102.3

NOTE. Wilcoxon rank sum test (with Van der Waerden quantile normal scores) for two groups and Kruskal-Wallis test for three groups. The χ2 rank test P value for associations of best response with RRM1 was < .01, and it was > .10 for best response with ERCC1.27

Abbreviations: NOS, not otherwise specified; CT, computed tomography; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease.