Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Dec 14.
Published in final edited form as: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Jun;77(3):543–553. doi: 10.1037/a0015622

Table 5. LGM Interaction Model for CBCL Externalizing.

Moderator Intercept est (SE) Slope est (SE)
Intervention status fixed at 0 −1.72 (0.52)*
Partner relationship quality −0.11(0.03)* −0.04 (0.02)
Parenting daily hassles 0.26 (0.03)* −0.03 (0.02)
Maternal depression 0.03 (0.03) 0.02 (0.02)
Substance use problem 0.39 (0.77) −0.19 (0.48)
Teen parent status 0.36 (0.60) −0.37 (0.38)
Low maternal education 1.39 (0.60) 0.45 (0.38)
Single parenthood −0.36 (0.53) 0.32 (0.33)
Interactions: Treatment ×
 Partner Relationship Quality fixed at 0 −0.06 (0.04)
 Parenting Daily Hassles fixed at 0 −0.01 (0.04)
 Maternal Depression fixed at 0 −0.04 (0.03)
 Substance Use Problem fixed at 0 −0.04 (0.88)
 Teen Parent Status fixed at 0 −0.52 (0.69)
 Low Maternal Education fixed at 0 −2.16 (0.69)*
 Single Parenthood fixed at 0 0.19 (0.62)
Parameter intercept 21.08 (0.44)* −1.64 (0.38)*
Parameter residual variance 32.08 (3.38)* 8.86 (1.68)*

Note. LGM = latent growth model; CBCL = Child Behavior Checklist; est = estimate.

*

p < .05.

p < .10 (trend).