Skip to main content
. 2009 Sep 21;587(Pt 22):5411–5425. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.176552

Table 1.

Kinetics of FDDI

SSC (n= 363) MC (n= 41) AC (n= 46) VC2 (n= 119) mPFC (n= 67) KW test, Dunn P < 0.01 KW test, Dunn P < 0.05
Amplitude (mV) −0.718 ± 0.488 −0.651 ± 0.427 −1.518 ± 0.787 −0.971 ± 0.796 −0.558 ± 0.271 3–1,2,4,5 3–1,2,4,5
4–5 4–5
Onset (s) 0.107 ± 0.043 0.193 ± 0.062 0.190 ± 0.032 0.195 ± 0.053 0.185 ± 0.030 1–5
Slope rise (mV ms−1) −0.010 ± 0.008 −0.009 ± 0.006 −0.023 ± 0.015 −0.012 ± 0.011 −0.009 ± 0.006 3–1,2,4,5 3–1,2,4,5
Slope decay (mV ms−1) 0.007 ± 0.005 0.006 ± 0.005 0.012 ± 0.007 0.006 ± 0.006 0.004 ± 0.003 3–1,2,4,5 3–1,2,4,5
1–5 1–4,5
Symmetry 0.448 ± 0.114 0.426 ± 0.124 0.396 ± 0.098 0.379 ± 0.133 0.374 ± 0.137 1–4,5 1–3,4,5
Overshoot (mV) 0.083 ± 0.116 0.101 ± 0.122 0.107 ± 0.107 0.017 ± 0.179 0.066 ± 0.088 4–1,3 4–1,2,3

Kinetic parameters of FDDI for SSC, MC, AC, VC2 and mPFC as displayed in Fig. 4 (means ±s.d.). Statistically significant differences between individual areas, tested with Kruskal–Wallis (with α < 0.01 and α < 0.05 significance level) followed by Dunn's method for multiple comparisons, are shown in the two rightmost columns.