Table A1.
Decision Model | Decision Scenario | Decision Type | Comparator | Costing | Intended Use Stratification* | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tier 1 | Tier 2 | |||||
A | Single technology/drug under review, de-listing of previously approved candidate drugs not an option | Appropriateness only (ie, does not involve a funding decision or recommendation) | Benchmark against credible alternative(s) | Cost models not required | ||
B | Single technology/drug under review, de-listing of previously approved candidate drugs not an option | Appropriateness and funding | Benchmark against credible alternative(s) | At least one cost model required | Curalib (A) | |
C | Several competing new drugs under review, de-listing of previously approved candidate drugs not an option | Appropriateness only | Rank against one another | Cost model not required | ||
D | Several competing new drugs under review, de-listing of previously approved drugs not an option | Appropriateness and funding | Rank against one another | At least one cost model required | Pallialib (B) | |
E | Single drug only, de-listing of prior approved drugs is an option | Appropriateness only | Benchmark against a prior approved candidate drug or rank against several prior drugs | Cost model not required | ||
F | Single drug only, de-listing of prior approved drugs is an option | Appropriateness and funding | Benchmark against prior approved drug or rank against several prior drugs | At least one cost model required | ||
G | Several competing drugs, de-listing of prior approved drugs is an option | Appropriateness only | Rank against currently competing drugs and against prior approvals | Cost model not required | ||
H | Several competing drugs, de-listing of prior approved drugs is an option | Appropriateness and funding | Rank against currently competing drugs and against prior approvals | At least one cost model required |
NOTE. Tier 1 indicates adjuvant or curative treatment; tier 2, palliative treatment for advanced metastatic disease.