Skip to main content
. 2009 Oct 31;105(1):129–139. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcp258

Table 1.

Summary of published results on the physiological responses among floodplain forest tree species that could indicate regulation of water status for the avoidance of drought stress during dry periods

Physiological trait Response Value Species Citation
Leaf phenology Senescence None Parolin et al. (2005)
Leaf water potential Decrease −1·24 to −2·7 MPa Laetia corymbulosa Armbrüster et al. (2004)
Photosynthetic CO2 uptake Decrease 4–14 µmol CO2 m−2 s−1 Pseudobombax munguba Waldhoff et al. (1998)
Stomatal conductance Decrease <100 mmol m−2 s−1 None, except Crataeva benthamii Parolin (2000)
Root respiration Decrease 50–60 µL O2 g f. wt and 40–90 µL O2 g f. wt Astrocaryum jauari and Macrolobium acaciifolium (juvenile) Schlüter (1989)
Vitamin E Increase α-Tocopherol 6 µg m−2 and δ-tocotrienol 9 µg m−2 Garcinia brasiliensis (seedling) Oliveira-Wittmann (2006)

All traits were measured on plants in the field in the Manaus region except Vitamin E concentrations, which were measured on seedlings subjected to experimental drought.