Skip to main content
. 2009 Oct 22;37(22):7715–7727. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp730

Table 2.

Calculated binding free energies (ΔG) and hydrogen bond occupancies of selected intercalation binding models

Complex H-bond occupancy (%)
ΔG (kcal/mol)
Coralyne angle (°)
Res 6–19 Res 7–18 Avg Dev Avg Dev
cisWH(a)-c1-270d 42.3 63.8 − 25.33 3.42 216.78 6.73
cisWH(b)-alt-c1-45d 75.5 82.0 − 28.01 2.75 10.03 5.05
transHH-c1-0d 56.8 58.9 − 26.15 3.47 22.25 7.03
transHH-c1-225d 58.3 59.6 − 25.46 3.66 219.93 15.55
transWH-c1-45d 59.0 66.8 − 26.53 3.72 29.78 17.06
transWH-c1-180d 61.2 59.8 − 32.48 3.12 193.57 5.81
transWH-c1-270d-f 53.9 59.7 − 27.39 3.77 184.24 13.07
transWS-c1-45d-f 45.4 57.9 − 25.02 4.28 336.51 7.25
transWW-c1-0d 63.8 62.9 − 28.73 2.95 344.21 3.85
transWW-c1-135d-f 57.3 64.3 − 31.06 2.73 148.89 4.93
transWW-c1-315d-f 61.1 64.4 − 29.68 2.74 325.29 4.09

Only the polar and non-polar contributions of the free energies were calculated. The free energies of the complex [homo-(dA) duplex and coralyne], receptor [homo-(dA) duplex] and ligand (coralyne) were calculated using the partial structures extracted from the same snapshots. ΔG was averaged over the final 1 ns period. The naming convention of the complexes is explained in the text. The occupancies of the H-bonds were calculated separately for the two base pairs (between residue 6 and 19 and between residue 7 and 18).