Skip to main content
. 2009 Dec;11(12):1329–1339. doi: 10.1593/neo.91110

Table 3.

Relationship between CRABP2 Protein Expression and Clinicopathological Variables in HNSCC Patients.

Variables Category CRABP2,* n (%) P Negative Positive
Age ≥53 1 (50.00) 13 (55.38) >.999
>53 7 (50.00) 52 (44.62)
Tumor site Oral cavity 3 (37.50) 20 (30.77) NA
Larynx 4 (50.00) 26 (40.00)
Hypopharynx 1 (12.50) 19 (29.23)
Tumor size T1 + T2 5 (71.43) 17 (29.82) .029
T3 + T4 2 (28.57) 40 (70.18)
Lymph nodes N0 5 (62.50) 56 (91.80) .075
N+ 3 (37.50) 5 (8.20)
Histologic grade 1 3 (37.5) 22 (33.85) NA
2 5 (62.5) 36 (55.38)
3 0 7 (10.77)
Vascular invasion No 6 (75.00) 50 (80.65) .707
Yes 2 (25.00) 12 (19.35)
Lymphatic permeation No 2 (25.00) 43 (69.35) .014
Yes 6 (75.00) 19 (30.65)
Perineural infiltration No 6 (75.00) 34 (54.84) .278
Yes 2 (25.00) 28 (45.16)

NA indicates not applied.

*

Percentages considering cases with complete information.

Statistically significant.