Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jan 12.
Published in final edited form as: Physiol Behav. 2010 Jan 12;99(1):109–117. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.10.016

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Difference in oil intake (% from LETO) across sham feeding conditions. OLETF rats consumed significantly more 75% oil in non-deprived compared to the deprived condition. There was a trend for decreased consumption of low concentration oils (12.5 and 25%) in the non-deprived relative to the deprived condition, but this was not significant. Data are expressed as means ± SEM. * P < 0.05 denotes statistical significance from non-deprived condition,