Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Inf Model. 2009 Oct;49(10):2190–2201. doi: 10.1021/ci9000376

Table 2.

Performance of various schemes on ECFP4 descriptor-space

Test Set # BAYESIAN SVMR SVM2R RP SVMRP
1 0.461 0.710 0.725 0.716 0.730
2 0.467 0.728 0.739 0.724 0.734
3 0.474 0.718 0.736 0.726 0.730
4 0.471 0.728 0.739 0.728 0.733
5 0.465 0.724 0.735 0.716 0.728
6 0.473 0.731 0.739 0.723 0.736
7 0.473 0.714 0.728 0.707 0.725
8 0.465 0.735 0.747 0.731 0.739
9 0.468 0.717 0.733 0.723 0.733
10 0.471 0.740 0.749 0.731 0.748
Avg 0.469 0.725 0.737 0.723 0.734

The entry in each cell corresponds to the uninterpolated precision of the column method for a given test set. Entries in bold represent winners for every test set.