Table 5.
Performance of various schemes on ECFP4 descriptor-space
| Cluster # | BAYESIAN | SVMR | SVM2R | RP | SVMRP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.602 | 0.789 | 0.815 | 0.809 | 0.812 |
| 2 | 0.252 | 0.612 | 0.628 | 0.656 | 0.616 |
| 3 | 0.237 | 0.593 | 0.601 | 0.554 | 0.578 |
| 4 | 0.338 | 0.568 | 0.591 | 0.553 | 0.526 |
| 5 | 0.280 | 0.608 | 0.611 | 0.592 | 0.605 |
| 6 | 0.460 | 0.655 | 0.671 | 0.664 | 0.608 |
| 7 | 0.362 | 0.634 | 0.637 | 0.589 | 0.595 |
| 8 | 0.117 | 0.515 | 0.522 | 0.441 | 0.458 |
| 9 | 0.376 | 0.637 | 0.636 | 0.610 | 0.632 |
| 10 | 0.296 | 0.496 | 0.512 | 0.495 | 0.476 |
| Avg | 0.332 | 0.611 | 0.622 | 0.596 | 0.590 |
The entry in each cell corresponds to the uninterpolated precision of the column method for a given test set. Entries in bold represent winners for every test set.