Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul;5(4):188–192. doi: 10.1200/JOP.0942006

Table 3.

Provider Satisfaction Data

Topic Provider Feedback
IVM (n = 6 physicians, 3 NPs and/or PAs) SVM (n = 5 physicians, 3 NPs and/or PAs)
Factors influencing practice model Clinical volume Physician preference
NP/PA experience Physician RVU targets
Desire to have collaborative model built on expertise/strengths of both physicians and NPs/PAs Easier for physician to manage schedule, given difficulty with support staff managing schedule
Perception that model increases capacity and revenue Perception that patient wants to see physician
Perception that shared visits cause delays for patient Value added by both physicians and NPs/PAs
Confidence that RVUs high enough for physician to allow independent NP/PA visits Physician desire to maintain control of patient care
Skills of each clinician applied where those skills are needed Perception that physician billing generates more revenue
Physician satisfaction Very satisfied Very satisfied
NP/PA satisfaction Very satisfied Moderately satisfied
Managers of non–face-to-face clinical work NPs/PAs, program RNs NPs/PAs, program RNs
Ideal practice model features Program RNs perform triage, manage non–face-to-face clinical work
More robust clinical administrative support system for managing patient scheduling
Truly collaborative team of physicians, NPs, PAs, RNs, administrative support

Abbreviations: IVM, independent visit model; SVM, shared visit model; NP, nurse practitioner; PA, physician assistant; RVU, relative value unit; RN, registered nurse.