Skip to main content
. 2009 Sep 29;101(12):1961–1971. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605255

Table 4. Risk analysis for time to thromboembolic event.

    Covariate factor effect
Treatment effect adjusted by covariate
Covariate n Hazard ratio (95% CI) P-valuea Hazard ratio (95% CI) P-valuea
Treatment effect (unadjusted) 2297 1.62 (1.13; 2.31) 0.0081
Gender 2297 1.09 (0.76; 1.57) 0.637 1.62 (1.14; 2.32) 0.0078
Previous thromboembolic event 2297 2.23 (1.13; 4.38) 0.021b 1.64 (1.15; 2.35) 0.0065
Coronary artery disease 2297 1.99 (0.88; 4.52) 0.098b 1.62 (1.14; 2.32) 0.0079
Hypertension 2297 1.57 (1.08; 2.27) 0.018b 1.62 (1.13; 2.31) 0.0082
Diabetes 2297 1.16 (0.62; 2.14) 0.643 1.62 (1.13; 2.32) 0.0080
Dyslipidemia 2297 1.96 (0.86; 4.44) 0.108b 1.64 (1.14; 2.34) 0.0069
Previous MI, angina, unstable angina 2297 1.16 (0.54; 2.48) 0.704 1.62 (1.13; 2.31) 0.0081
Obesity 2297 0.76 (0.46; 1.25) 0.286 1.62 (1.14; 2.32) 0.0077
Age >65 years at baseline 2297 1.35 (0.96; 1.91) 0.085b 1.62 (1.13; 2.31) 0.0084
  Control Epoetin-β  
Subgroup n Number of events KM 90 day event rate n Number of events KM 90 day event rate Hazard ratio (95% CI)
All patients 1053 46 0.96 1244 88 0.94 1.62 (1.13; 2.31)
 No risk factors 555 20 0.96 646 36 0.96 1.54 (0.89; 2.66)
 One risk factor 348 22 0.93 431 31 0.93 1.09 (0.63; 1.88)
 Two risk factors 125 2 0.99 136 13 0.90 6.35 (1.43; 28.13)
 Three or more risk factors 25 2 0.92 31 8 0.77 3.33 (0.71; 15.69)
a

HR P-value (Wald test).

b

Covariates significant at the 15% level in univariate analysis.